Madhya Pradesh High Court

MCRC/52371/2018 of KHET SINGH Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 31 December 2018

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court Of Madhya PradeshThe High Court Of Madhya Pradesh MCRC-52371-2018 (KHET

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

The High Court Of Madhya PradeshMCRC-52371-2018

(KHET SINGHVs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)

[31][-][12][-][2018]Jabalpur, Dated :

Shri S.K. Patel, learned counsel for the applicants.

Shri Pramod Pandey, learned Government Advocate for therespondent no.1\State.

Shri B.J. Chaurasiya, learned counsel for the objector.

Heard.

Perused the case diary.

This first bail application under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. which hasbeen filed on behalf of the applicants for grant of anticipatory bail as theyapprehend their arrest in connection with Crime No.216/2018 registered atPolice Station Harpalpur, District Chhatarpur (M.P.) against their for offencepunishable under Sections 458, 452, 323, 294, 506 and 34 of Indian PenalCode.

In support of the contentions of the applicants some documents havebeen produced by the applicants, which show that they have been falselyimplicated in the present case due to enmity with regard to the last election.Learned counsel for the applicants further submits that complainant wasconvicted under Section 302 of I.P.C. and recently released on bail. It is alsosubmitted by the applicants that false report has been lodged by thecomplainant against the applicants, therefore, they be released on anticipatorybail.

Learned counsel for the complainant and learned GovernmentAdvocate for the respondent-State vehemently opposed the contentions ofthe applicants. They further stated that applicant-Khet Singh has criminalantecedent.

Looking to the aforesaid circumstances, without commenting on themerits of the case, the application is allowed and it is ordered that in the eventof arrest the applicants namely Khet Singh, Charan Singh and Dragpal shall be released on bail on furnishing their bail bond in the sum ofRs.25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety each in thelike amount to the satisfaction of Arresting Officer.

I t is directed that the applicants shall abide by the conditionsenumerated under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. It is made clear that theapplicants shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when they areso directed and co-operate with the investigation and they shall also appearbefore the trial Court, failing which their bail application shall automaticallystand cancelled without further reference to the Court.

Accordingly, M.Cr.C. stands allowed and disposed of.

rj

Certified copy as per rules.

(SMT. ANJULI PALO)V. JUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead