Madhya Pradesh High Court
MP/3736/2021 of RAMBICHARE ALLAS MITTHU GURJAR Vs DHARMENDRA KHAIRWAR on 1 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPURBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DUPPALA VENKATA RAMANAON THE 1[st] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
MISC. PETITION No. 3736 of 2021
BETWEEN:-
RAMBICHARE ALLAS MITTHU GURJAR S/O SHRIDULLAR GURJAR, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST R/O VILLAGE SINDHARDISTRICT SINGRAULI (MADHYA PRADESH)
(NONE )AND1.DHARMENDRA KHAIRWAR S/O LATE SHRIPRADHAN KHAIRWAR, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,R/O VILLAGE CHAKARIYA P.S. MORBA TAHSILCHITRANGI DISTT. SINGRAULI (MADHYAPRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
2.SMT. BIFNI KHAIRWAR W/O LATE SHRIPRADHAN KHAIRWAR, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,R/O VILLAGE CHAKARIYA P.S. MORBA TAHSILCHITRANGI DISTT. SINGRAULI (MADHYAPRADESH)PRADHAN KHAIRWAR, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,R/O VILLAGE CHAKARIYA P.S. MORBA TAHSILCHITRANGI DISTT. SINGRAULI (MADHYAPRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
This petition coming on for orders this day, th e court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This Court ordered to issue notice to respondent on 08.12.2023 but P.F.
is not paid.
2 . When the matter came up for hearing today, neither counsel for theappellant is present nor sought any accommodation on their behalf. Under these circumstances, this Court has no option except to dismiss the petition for non-payment of P.F.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-payment of P.F.
vibha
(DUPPALA VENKATA RAMANA)JUDGE