Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/46803/2016 of SEEMA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 30 December 2016
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.108 CRM-M No.46803 of 2016 Date of decision: 30.12.2016 Seema and another ....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL Present: Mr. Sukhjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. * * *
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.108
CRMpM No.46803 of 2016Date of decision: 30.12.2016
Seema and another
Petitioners
VeTSuU
State of Haryana and others
....Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
Present:Mr. Sukhyit Singh, Advocatefor the petitioners,
* * *
DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that thepetitioners have married each other against the wishes of parents ofpetitioner No.1 and on account of this act on their part, they are underthreat of being eliminated at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6. In viewof the above, seeking protection, a representation dated 29.12.2016(Annexure P-5) was made on behalf of the petitioners to theSuperintendent of Police, Hisar, but to no avail.
In the above circumstances, the petitioners have approachedthis Court through the present petition.
Without expressing any opinion on merits of the matter,particularly the validity of the alleged marriage, the Superintendent ofPolice, Hisar (respondent No.2) is directed to forthwith consider theaforesaid representation dated 29.12.2016 (Annexure P-5) madeon behalf of the petitioners and thereafter take appropriate CRM;M No.46803 of 2016
action on the same as is deemed fit in accordance with law to ensure the protection of life and liberty of the petitioners.
The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
(DEEPAK SIBAL)JUDGE
December 30, 2016Jyoti I
(i) Whether speaking/reasonedYes/No+11/Whether reportableYes/No