Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/2245/2024 of MANSHARAM Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPURBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRAON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 2245 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
1.MANSHARAM S/O LATE BHADRU, AGED ABOUT58 YEARS, OCCUPATION: FAMRER CAST GONDR/O LEELAMETA TEHSIL PARASWARA DISTRICTBALAGHAT (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.SARASWATI BAI W/O LATE GHANSHYAM, AGEDABOUT 49 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEWIFECASTE GOND R/O LEELAMETA TEHSILPARASWARA DISTRICT BALAGHAT (MADHYAPRADESH)ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEWIFECASTE GOND R/O LEELAMETA TEHSILPARASWARA DISTRICT BALAGHAT (MADHYAPRADESH)
3.NIRMALA D/O LATE GHANSHYAM, AGED ABOUT25 YEARS, OCCUPATION: CASTE GOND R/OLEELAMETA TEHSIL PARASWARA DISTRICTBALAGHAT (MADHYA PRADESH)25 YEARS, OCCUPATION: CASTE GOND R/OLEELAMETA TEHSIL PARASWARA DISTRICTBALAGHAT (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI SHISHIR KUMAR SONI - ADVOCATE)
.....PETITIONERS
AND
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUEVALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL DISTRICT BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUEVALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL DISTRICT BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)
2.COLLECTOR BALAGHAT DISTRICT BALAGHAT(MADHYA PRADESH)(MADHYA PRADESH)
3.UPPER COLLECTOR BAIHAR TEHSIL BAIHARDISTRICT BALAGHAT (MADHYA PRADESH)DISTRICT BALAGHAT (MADHYA PRADESH)
4.SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (REVENUE) BAIHARTEHSIL BAIHAR DISTRICT BALAGHAT (MADHYAPRADESH)TEHSIL BAIHAR DISTRICT BALAGHAT (MADHYAPRADESH)
5.MANISHA D/O JAISRAM CASTE MAHAR R/OVILLAGE LEELAMETA TEHSIL PARASWARVILLAGE LEELAMETA TEHSIL PARASWAR
DISTRICT (MADHYA PRADESH)
6.MANISHA D/O JAISWAM OCCUPATION: CASTEMAHAR R/O VILLAGE LEELAMETA TEHSILPARASWAR DISTRICT (MADHYA PRADESH)
7.TAPASYA D/O JAISRAM OCCUPATION: CASTEMAHAR R/O VILLAGE LEELAMETA TEHSILPARASWAR DISTRICT (MADHYA PRADESH)
8.TAMANNA D/O JAISRAM OCCUPATION: CASTEMAHAR R/O VILLAGE LEELAMETA TEHSILPARASWAR DISTRICT (MADHYA PRADESH)
9.KANHAIYALA S/O TATU MARAR R/O VILLAGEPANDI TEHSIL BAIHAR DISTRICT (MADHYAPRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(SHRI VED PRAKASH TIWARI - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FORRESPONDENTS NOS.1 TO 4)
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
After arguing at length counsel appearing for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to approach the civil court for redressal of his grievance.
Prayer allowed.
The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
LR
(VISHAL MISHRA)JUDGE