Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/2055/2024 of SMT KAVITA SINHA Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPURBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGHON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 2055 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
SMT KAVITA SINHA W/O SANJAY KUMAR SINHA, AGEDABOUT 52 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUS OPERATOR R/O HNO 375 NEAR POWER HOUSE BARELI DISTRICT RAISEN(MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI ASHISH RAWAT -ADVOCATE)
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGHSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTVALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL DISTRICT BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)
2.REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BHOPALDISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
3.SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORTAUTHORITY BHOPAL DISTRICT BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI SUBODH KATHAR -G.A FOR RESPONDENT/STATE)
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The grievance of the petitioner is that despite his application filed before the respondent no.2 on 12.01.2024 along with the requisite fee in respect ofgrant of temporary permit on the route Gadarwara to Indore, the same has notbeen decided so far.
In the absence of any such permission/temporary permit, the petitionercannot ply his vehicle on the said route. Since the representation filed dated12.01.2024 has not been decided so far, therefore, this petition can be disposedof by directing the respondent no.2/competent authority to take note of pendingrepresentation of the petitioner and decide the same within a period of threeweeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on meritsof the case.
In above terms, this writ petition is disposed of.
tarun
(RAJ MOHAN SINGH)JUDGE