Allahabad High Court

WRIT PETITION 349 of 2022 on 19 July 2013

Court No. - 7

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1875 of 2025

Petitioner :- Manendra SinghRespondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 OthersCounsel for Petitioner :- Durga TiwariCounsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.

1. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner inter-aliawith the prayer to direct the respondent no.3-District BasicEducation Officer, District Azamarh to permit the petitioner to joinon the post of Instructor in Upper Primary School, Sundar SaraiBallo, Vikas Khand Ajmatgarh, District Azamgarh and furtherdirect the respondent no.3 to decide the representation submittedby the petitioner for joining.

2. It is argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner thatpetitioner was initially appointed on the post of part time instructorvide letter of appointment dated 19.07.2013 on contractual basisfor eleven months. The aforesaid appointment was renewed fromtime to time and till academic session 2022-2023. It is furtherargued that petitioner was falsely implicated in Case Crime No.349 of 2022 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-BI.P.C. and under section 6/10 of the U.P. Public Examination(Prevention of unfair means Act) and he was not named in the firstinformation report but he arrested and sent to jail. It is also arguedthat petitioner has been granted bail by this Hon'ble Court videorder dated 22.12.2022. After petitioner was released on bail, sincethe petitioner was not permitted to join his duty, he submitted arepresentation before the respondent no.3-District Basic EducationOfficer, District Azamarh on 03.03.2023. Thereafter, in pursuanceto the application dated 03.03.2023, respondent no.3-District BasicEducation Officer, District Azamarh wrote a letter dated06.04.2023 to the Block Education Officer, Ajamatgarh forsubmitting his report. Thereafter, Block Education Officer,Ajamatgarh submitted his report on 09.05.2023. It is argued by thelearned counsel for the petitioner that considerable time hasalready been elapsed but till date no decision has been taken by therespondent no.3, hence present writ petition.

Page 1 of 2

3. On the other hand learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents submitted that respondent no.3-DistrictBasic Education Officer, District Azamarh will take appropriatedecision in the matter, expeditiously.

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned StandingCounsel for the State-respondents and perused the record.

5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition isdisposed of directing the respondent no.3-District Basic EducationOfficer, District Azamarh to take appropriate decision in the mattermost expeditiously and preferably within a period of four weeksfrom the date of production of a certified copy of this order,without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of theparties, if there is no legal impediment.

Order Date :- 14.2.2025

T.S.

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead