MCRC/12091/2016 of DHARAM BAI Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 29 December 2016

Arguments

MCRC-12091-2016

(DHARAM BAIVs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)

29-12-2016

Shri Ashish Gupta,learned Counsel for theapplicant.

Smt.Mamta Shandilya, learned Dy. Govt.Advocate for the respondent/State.

This is the first application filed by theapplicant under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. forgrant of bail.

The case diary is available.

Arguments heard.

The present applicant has been arrested by the Police Station�Tarana, District Ujjain inCrime No.470/16 under Sections 457 & 380 ofIPC.

According to the prosecution story, it is alleged that the present applicant along with co-accused committed a theft of Rs. 2.5 lacs. Someornaments were recovered from the possessionof the applicant. Learned counsel for theapplicant submits that the ornaments,recovered from the applicant, were notidentified by the complainant and charge sheethas been filed.

Learned counsel for the respondent/State hasopposed this application.

Taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, I am of the view thatit is a fit case for grant of bail. This applicationfiled under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is allowed.Accordingly, it is directed that the applicantshall be released on bail on her furnishingpersonal bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees ThirtyThousand only) and one local solvent surety ofthe like amount to the satisfaction of theconcerned Magistrate for her appearance on allthe dates of hearing as may be directed in thisregard during trial.

She is further directed that on being so released on bail, she would comply with theconditions enumerated under Section 437 (3) ofCr.P.C. meticulously.Certified copy, as per rules.

(ALOK VERMA)JUDGE