Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/1113/2024 of PRAMOD TRIVEDI Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBODH ABHYANKARON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 1113 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
PRAMOD TRIVEDI S/O SHRI MAHESHCHANDRATRIVEDI, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCCUPATION:SERVICE D-411, COSMOS CITY BICHOLI MARDANA,INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI SHUBHAM SHARMA, ADVOCATE)
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPALSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCEVALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCEVALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.MANAGING DIRECTOR M.P. STATEAGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD 26 ARERAHILLS KISAN BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH)AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD 26 ARERAHILLS KISAN BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH)
3.JOINT DIRECTOR M.P. STATE AGRICULTUREMARKETING BOARD REGIONAL OFFICE 28BHARATPURI UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)MARKETING BOARD REGIONAL OFFICE 28BHARATPURI UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)
4.SECRETARY KRISHI UPAJ MANDI BARNAGARUJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY MS. HARSHLATA SONI, P.L./G.A.)
.....RESPONDENTS
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
1 ] This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:- "It is, therefore prayed that:- (a) A writ/ direction/ order in the nature of mandamus orcertiorari or as deemed fit be issued to the respondents toextend the service tenure of the petitioner with all consequentialbenefits.
(b) The respondents also be directed to absorb the petitioner andthe respondents be directed to permit the petitioner to continuethe petitioner to work upto the age of 62 years and the servicesof the petitioner be extended.
(c) This petition be allowed with costs.
(d) Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit be alsogranted."
2] Admittedly, the petitioner has not filed any representation before the respondents, before filing this petition.
3] In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a detailed representation along with all the relevantdocuments before the respondent No.2/competent authority within a period oftwo weeks from today, which shall be decided by the respondentNo.2/competent authority in accordance with law, by a reasoned and speakingorder within a further period of three months.
4] It is made clear that this Court has not reflected upon the merits of the case.
5] With the aforesaid, present petition stands disposed of.
Certified copy as per rules.
Bahar
(SUBODH ABHYANKAR)JUDGE