Madhya Pradesh High Court
MA/1432/2017 of RAMSEWAK MEHRA Vs SAMPAT BAI MEHRA on 1 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAMOD KUMAR AGRAWALON THE 1[st] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
MISC. APPEAL No. 1432 of 2017
BETWEEN:-
1.RAMSEWAK MEHRA S/O SHRI NATHURAMMEHRA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCCUPATION:AGRICULTURE VILLAGE ANHAI P.S. BANKHEDITEH. BANDKHEDI DISTT. HOSHANGABAD(MADHYA PRADESH)
2.KARAN @ KIRAN MEHRA S/O NATHURAMMEHRA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCCUPATION:AGRICULTURE VILLAGE ANHAI PS BANKHEDITEHSIL BANDKHEDI (MADHYA PRADESH)
(NONE FOR APPELLANTS)
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.SAMPAT BAI MEHRA W/O SHRI CHOTELALMEHRA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCCUPATION:DOMESTIC WORK VILLAGE ANHAI P.S.BANKHEDI TEH. BANDKHEDI DISTT.HOSHANGABAD (MADHYA PRADESH)MEHRA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCCUPATION:DOMESTIC WORK VILLAGE ANHAI P.S.BANKHEDI TEH. BANDKHEDI DISTT.HOSHANGABAD (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.VIJAY MEHRA S/O LATE CHOTELAL MEHRA,AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS, VILLAGE ANHAI PSBANKHEDI TEHSIL BANDKHEDI (MADHYAPRADESH)AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS, VILLAGE ANHAI PSBANKHEDI TEHSIL BANDKHEDI (MADHYAPRADESH)
3.KUMARI PRIYA MEHRA D/O LATE CHOTELALMEHRA, AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS, VILLAGE ANHAIPS BANKHEDI TEHSIL BANDKHEDI (MADHYAPRADESH)MEHRA, AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS, VILLAGE ANHAIPS BANKHEDI TEHSIL BANDKHEDI (MADHYAPRADESH)
(NONE FOR RESPONDENTS)
.....RESPONDENTS
This appeal coming on for admission this day, the court passed the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This case is pending since year 2017. On previous occasion i.e.24,07,2017 and 11/08/2017, no one was present. Today also, no one is presenton behalf of the appellant even in the pass over round .
It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the instantcase.
Hence, the appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
navin
(PRAMOD KUMAR AGRAWAL)JUDGE