Madhya Pradesh High Court

MCRC/4179/2024 of SHRIRAM PATLE Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 1 February 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGATON THE 1[st] OF FEBRUARY, 2024

MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 4179 of 2024

BETWEEN:-

SHRIRAM PATLE S/O KHIRANLAL PATLE, AGED ABOUT54 YEARS, OCCUPATION: LABOUR RESIDENTS OFBADCHICHOLI POLICE STATION PANDHURNADISTRICDT CHHINDWARA (MADHYA PRADESH)

(BY SHRI M.K. MISHRA - ADVOCATE)

.....APPLICANT

AND

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH ITSFOREST RANGE OFFICER FOREST OFFICE ZONEPANDHURNA ARERA TASHIL PANDHURNA DISTRICTCHHINDWARA (MADHYA PRADESH)

(BY SHRI G.S. THAKUR - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)

.....RESPONDENTS

This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This is first application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of theCode of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail relating to Crime/PORNo.1954/84 registered at Police Station-Forest Range Officer, Forest OfficeZone Pandhurna Area, District-Chhindwara (M.P.) for the offence underSection 51 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that applicant isin jail since 03.10.2023. Applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated inthe case. Applicant is not having any criminal record. Offence is triable by Judicial Magistrate First Class. Other co-accused persons have been releasedon bail. In these circumstances, applicant may be released on bail.

3. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the State opposed theapplication for grant of bail.

4. Heard the counsel for the parties.

5. Case of present applicant is on parity with other co-accused person.

Office is not so serious in nature. Applicant is not having criminal record.

6. Considering aforesaid facts of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, bail application filed by applicant is allowed. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing personal bond ofRs.50,000/- (Rs. fifty thousand only) with one solvent surety in the likeamount to the satisfaction of the trial Court concerned for his regularappearance before Court on all such dates as may be fixed in this regard duringpendency of trial.

7. The applicant shall also abide by the following conditions of Section437 (3) of Cr. P. C. as under:- (a) that such person shall attend in accordance with the conditions of thebond executed under this Chapter; (b) that such person shall not commit any offence similar to the offenceof which he is accused, or suspected of the commission of which he issuspected and;

(c) that such person shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement,threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer ortamper with the evidence.

$A

8. C.C. as per rules.

(VISHAL DHAGAT)JUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead