Madhya Pradesh High Court
MCC/155/2024 of RAIMUNNIA @ RAIMUN Vs SHIVGULAN on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DWARKA DHISH BANSALON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
MISC. CIVIL CASE No. 155 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
1.RAIMUNNIA @ RAIMUN W/O LATE RAMSUNDERGUPTA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCCUPATION:HOUSE WIFE VILLAGE NADHA TEHSIL MAJHAULI(MADHYA PRADESH)GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCCUPATION:HOUSE WIFE VILLAGE NADHA TEHSIL MAJHAULI(MADHYA PRADESH)
2.RISHIRAJ @ ISRAJ S/O LATE RAMSUNDERGUPTA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCCUPATION:AGRICULTURIST R/O VILLAGE NADHA TEHSILMAJHULI (MADHYA PRADESH)GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCCUPATION:AGRICULTURIST R/O VILLAGE NADHA TEHSILMAJHULI (MADHYA PRADESH)
3.RAJU @ RAJENDRA PRASAD S/O NOT MENTION,AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE NADHATEHSIL MAJAHULI (MADHYA PRADESH)AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE NADHATEHSIL MAJAHULI (MADHYA PRADESH)
4.SMT MUNNA @ KAUSHILYA RAKHAIL W/ORISHIRAJ @ ISRAJ, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,OCCUPATION: HOUSE WORK R/O VILLAGENADHA TEHSIL MAJAHULI (MADHYA PRADESH)RISHIRAJ @ ISRAJ, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,OCCUPATION: HOUSE WORK R/O VILLAGENADHA TEHSIL MAJAHULI (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI S.M. SHUKLA - ADVOCATE )
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.SHIVGULAN S/O SUKHNANDAN GUPTA, AGEDABOUT 55 YEARS, VILLAGE NADHA TEHISLMAJHAULI (MADHYA PRADESH)ABOUT 55 YEARS, VILLAGE NADHA TEHISLMAJHAULI (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH THECOLLECTOR DISTRICT SIDHI DEPARTMENT OFHIGHER EDUCATION VALLABH BHAWANBHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)COLLECTOR DISTRICT SIDHI DEPARTMENT OFHIGHER EDUCATION VALLABH BHAWANBHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI AMILESH CHATURVEDI - ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT 1
)
following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
After arguments for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners praysfor withdrawal of this MCC with liberty to file duly constituted petition.
2. Prayer being reasonable is accepted and this MCC is permitted to bewithdrawn and is hereby disposed off with the aforesaid liberty.
3. Office is directed to return the certified copy of the order dated 08.01.2024to learned counsel for the petitioners after retaining its photocopy on record.
4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed off.
pb
(DWARKA DHISH BANSAL)JUDGE