Madhya Pradesh High Court
CONC/326/2024 of SUNIL PATIL Vs SUDAMA on 1 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDOREBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBODH ABHYANKARON THE 1[st] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
CONTEMPT PETITION CIVIL No. 326 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
SUNIL PATIL S/O SHRI GORAKH PATIL, AGED ABOUT 39YEAR S, OCCUPATION: GOVT. SERVICE ALIRAJPUR(MADHYA PRADESH)
SHRI AKASH RATHI, ADVOCATE
.....PETITIONER
AND
SUDAMA S/O PANDARINATH KHADE, AGED ABOUT 47YE A R S , OCCUPATION: IAS OFFICER / HEALTHCOMMISSIONER R/O HEALTH COMMISSIONERDIRECTORATE OF HEALTH SERVICES VALLABHBHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENT
This petition coming on for order this day, th e court passed thefollowing:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard on the question of admission.
2. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner against non- compliance on the part of the respondent in respect of the order passed by thisCourt on 14/12/2023 in W.P. No.30266/2023 (Sunil Patel Vs. State ofM.P.).
3. It is submitted that although a period of one months' time was granted to the competent authority to comply with the Court order, but till datethe order has not been complied with.
4. Under these circumstances, the respondent/competent authority isdirected to comply with the order passed by this Court on 14/12/2023 in W.P.No.30266/2023, Sunil Patel (supra) within a further period of one month fromthe date of receipt of certified copy of this order and if the order is notcomplied with within the aforesaid period and the petitioner is again compelledto file another contempt petition, then the costs of the present contempt petitionas well as the contempt petition which may be filed by the petitioner shall berecovered from the erring Officer.
5. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands disposed of.
C.c. as per rules.
das
(SUBODH ABHYANKAR)JUDGE