Gujarat High Court

MCA/257/1999 of SUMALIBEN W/O MANSING NURABHAINAIKA Vs AJITDAN RAVIDAN GADHVI on 8 November 2001

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION No 257 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION No 257 of 1999

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL

============================================================

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO

to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- SUMALIBEN W/O MANSING NURABHAINAIKAVersus AJITDAN RAVIDAN GADHVI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MA KHARADI for Applicants No. 1-2

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL

Date of decision: 08/11/2001

ORAL JUDGEMENT

1. The applicants, who are the parents of the deceased Koyabhai alias Shankarbhai, have filed M.A.C. Petition No.1876 of 1993 before the M.A.C. Tribunal, Baroda claiming compensation for the death of Koyabhai alias Shankarbhai in a vehicular accident which occurred at a place, which was within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal at Baroda. Now, the applicants have filed Misc. Civil Application under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code for transfer of the said petition to the M.A.C. Tribunal, Panchmahals, at Godhra, on the ground that the applicants reside with the jurisdiction of M.A.C. Tribunal, Panchmahals, at Godhra.

2. No reply has been filed by any of the opponents. Since the applicants reside within the jurisdiction of the said Tribunal, present Misc. Civil Application is allowed and M.A.C.Petition No.1876 of 1993 pending before the M.A.C.Tribunal, Baroda is ordered to be transferred to M.A.C. Tribunal, Panchmahals, at Godhra. Rule is made absolute accordingly with no order as to costs.

�����(M.C.Patel,J.)

vrp

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead