Gujarat High Court
WTR/25/1992 of ASHADEVI CHANDANBHAI Vs COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH-TAX on 8 November 2001
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD WEALTH TAX REFERENCE No 25 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
WEALTH TAX REFERENCE No 25 of 1992
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- ASHADEVI CHANDANBHAI
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH-TAX
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
1. WEALTH TAX REFERENCE No. 25 of 1992
SERVED BY RPAD - (N) for Petitioner No. 1
MR BB NAIK with MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
Date of decision: 08/11/2001
(Per : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH)
This reference has been made by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench under section 27(1)
of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.
2. Though the reference was made at the instance of the assessee, neither the paper book is filed so far, nor has the assessee appeared herself or through anyone, though served. Since the reference has been pending for has the assessee appeared herself or through anyone, though served. Since the reference has been pending for the last about 9 years, this Court sees no reason to wait any longer.
We accordingly decline to answer the question referred to us.
3. The Reference accordingly stands disposed of with no order as to costs.
�����(M.S. Shah,J)
�����(D.A. Mehta,J)
zgs/-