Madhya Pradesh High Court
MCRC/2041/2024 of IFRAN HUSSAIN Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 1 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDOREBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PREM NARAYAN SINGHON THE 1[st] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 2041 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
IFRAN HUSSAIN S/O AJGAR HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 48Y E A R S , OCCUPATION: GOVERNMENT JOBMEWATIPURA JAORA RATLAM (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....APPLICANT
(SHRI SANJAY KUMAR SHARMA, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THEPETITIONER .
AND
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH STATION HOUSEOFFICER THROUGH P.S. INDUSTRIAL AREA RATLAM(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(SHRI AJAY RAJ GUPTA APPEARING ON BEHALF OF ADVOCATEGENERAL & SHRI LUCKY JAIN APPEARED FOR RESPONDENT.
This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This is first bail application filed on behalf of the applicant under Section438 of Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail.
2. After arguing for some time, counsel for the applicant prays forwithdrawal of the application by submitting that the Investigating Officer andconcerning authorities may be directed to comply with the directions passed byHon'ble Apex Court in the Case of Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar &another [(2014) 8 SCC 273].
3. The prayer is allowed.
4. The application is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the InvestigatingOfficer and concerning authorities are directed to comply with the directionspassed by Hon'ble Apex Court in the Case of Arnesh Kumar (supra).5. With the aforesaid direction, the petition stands disposed of.
amit
(PREM NARAYAN SINGH)JUDGE