Madhya Pradesh High Court
CRR/1756/2023 of DHEERAJ SHAH Vs SMT. SANGEETA SHAH on 1 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGATON THE 1[st] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1756 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
DHEERAJ SHAH S/O SHRI LALJI SHAH, AGED ABOUT 25YEAR S , OCCUPATION: LABOURER RESIDENT OFVILLAGE GAHILGARH POLICE STATION VINDHYANAGAR DISTRICT SINGRAULI (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI NEERAJ SHAH - ADVOCATE)
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.SMT. SANGEETA SHAH W/O DHEERAJ SHAH,AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, OCCUPATION:HOUSEWIFE R/O VILLAGE GAHILGARH THANAVINDHYANAGAR DISTRICT SINGRAULI ATPRESENT R/O VILLAGE WAIDHAN TALI POLICESTATION WAIDHAN DISTRICT SINGRAULI(MADHYA PRADESH)AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, OCCUPATION:HOUSEWIFE R/O VILLAGE GAHILGARH THANAVINDHYANAGAR DISTRICT SINGRAULI ATPRESENT R/O VILLAGE WAIDHAN TALI POLICESTATION WAIDHAN DISTRICT SINGRAULI(MADHYA PRADESH)
2.KU. JANHAVI SHAH D/O DHEERAJ SHAH, AGEDABOUT 2 YEARS, OCCUPATION: THROUGHGUARDIAN SMT. SANGEETA SHAH W/O DEERAJSHAH R/O VILLAGE GAHILGARH THANAVINDHYANAGAR DISTRICT SINGRAULI ATPRESENT R/O VILLAGE WAIDHAN TALI POLICESTATION WAIDHAN DISTRICT SINGRAULI(MADHYA PRADESH)ABOUT 2 YEARS, OCCUPATION: THROUGHGUARDIAN SMT. SANGEETA SHAH W/O DEERAJSHAH R/O VILLAGE GAHILGARH THANAVINDHYANAGAR DISTRICT SINGRAULI ATPRESENT R/O VILLAGE WAIDHAN TALI POLICESTATION WAIDHAN DISTRICT SINGRAULI(MADHYA PRADESH)
3.ANURAG SHAH S/O DHEERAJ SHAH, AGED ABOUT23 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE GAHILGARH THANAVINDHYANAGAR DISTRICT SINGRAULI ATPRESENT R/O VILLAGE WAIDHAN TALI POLICESTATION WAIDHAN DISTRICT SINGRAULI(MADHYA PRADESH)23 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE GAHILGARH THANAVINDHYANAGAR DISTRICT SINGRAULI ATPRESENT R/O VILLAGE WAIDHAN TALI POLICESTATION WAIDHAN DISTRICT SINGRAULI(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI RAM NARAYAN SHAH - ADVOCATE FOR RES.NOS.1 & 2 )
This revision coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Applicant has filed criminal revision against order dated 11.03.2023passed by Principal Judge, Family court, Singrauli, by which, maintenanceunder Section 125 of Cr.P.C. was allowed in favour of Respondent Nos.1 & 2totaling to an amount of Rs.4500/-.
2 . It is submitted by counsel appearing for applicant that there iscompromise between parties and now they are living together. It is submittedthat respondent no longer want to prosecute the case. Respondent is livingalong with applicant and, therefore, she does not require any maintenance.
3. On query by Court, respondent appearing in person along with heradvocate submitted that since she is living along with her husband, she does notwant any maintenance and case may be disposed off on these terms.
4. Considering aforesaid submissions made by respondent, revision filedby applicant is disposed off. Order dated 11.03.2023 passed by PrincipalJudge, Family Court, Singrauli in MJCR No.231/2021 (Smt. Sangeeta Shah& Ors. Vs. Dheeraj Shah) is quashed.
5. Criminal Revision is disposed off.
nd
(VISHAL DHAGAT)
JUDGE