Gujarat High Court
CRA/522/1998 of KUNTHUNAGAR CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED Vs CHANDKHEDA NAGAR PALIKA on 26 November 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 522 of 1998 Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 522 of 1998
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- KUNTHUNAGAR CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITEDVersus CHANDKHEDA NAGAR PALIKA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR AJ PATEL for Petitioner MRS SASI V PARIKH for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT Date of decision: 26/11/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. As a result of the hearing and discussion, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the interest of justice would best be served by directing the trial court to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible and preferably before 30th June 2000, since the issue directly involved in the present revision is also the issue directly raised in the suit, and is covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Karimbhai K.
Belim & Ors. Vs. State of Gujarat, reported at 1996(1)
GLH page 200.
2. Accordingly it is directed that the trial court shall hear and dispose of the pending suit as expeditiously as possible and in any case before 30th June 2000. It is clarified that the interim relief granted in this revision shall continue to operate until the suit is decided.
3. This revision is accordingly disposed of. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Yadi to be sent to the trial court forthwith.
******