Gujarat High Court
AO/411/1997 of KIRANKUMAR TRIBHOVANDAS PATEL Vs EXECUTIVE ENGINEER on 1 December 1998
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No 411 of 1997 with CIVIL APPLICATION No 7711 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
APPEAL FROM ORDER No 411 of 1997
with
CIVIL APPLICATION No 7711 of 1997
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- KIRANKUMAR TRIBHOVANDAS PATEL
Versus
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,CAD UNIT, NARMADA NAHER BHUVAN
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BG PATEL for Appellant/Applicant MR MB GANDHI for Respondent/Opponent No. 1
MR TRILOK J PATEL for Respondent/Opponent No. 4, 5 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT
Date of decision: 01/12/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT
1. When this appeal was called out for final hearing, learned counsel for the appellant stated that it is probable that the suit might have been disposed off by today in which case, the present appeal may not survive. Obviously if the suit has been disposed off by today, the present orders will not affect the appellant-plaintiff in any manner, let alone affect him adversely.
2. If however, the suit has not been disposed off by today, it is directed that the trial court shall hear and disposed off the said suit as expeditiously as possible and in any case not later than 31st August, 1999. Learned counsel for the parties have assured this Court that the respective parties shall cooperate with the trial court in the early disposal of the suit as aforesaid. It is understood that the present status quo shall continue until the suit is decided.
3. In view of these directions, learned counsel for the appellant does not press this appeal for any further reliefs. Accordingly, the appeal as also the Civil Application stand disposed off with no order as to costs.
4. The Registry is directed to send yadi to the trial court forthwith i.e. not later than 5th December, 1998. Direct service is also permitted.
*****
pirzada/-