Gujarat High Court
SCA/9101/1997 of RAMESHCHANDRA VITHALDAS CHAUHAN Vs GSRTC on 10 November 1998
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No.9101 of 1997 ** For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE N.N.MATHUR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No.9101 of 1997
**
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE N.N.MATHUR
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
1 to 5 : NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- RAMESHCHANDRA VITHALDAS CHAUHAN
Versus GSRTC
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR JS BRAHMBHATT for Petitioner
MR HS MUNSHAW for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE N.N.MATHUR
Date of decision: 10/11/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT :
Rule. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner has not been given appointment on compassionate grounds for the reason that his brother has raised certain objections. It does not appear that the brother of the petitioner, Shri Chandrakant has expressed any intention for taking the job. In view of this his brother of the petitioner, Shri Chandrakant has expressed any intention for taking the job. In view of this his objection deserves to be ignored.
2. The respondent Corporation is directed to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate grounds ignoring the objection of the petitioner's brother, Shri Chandrakant. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs.
--- karim*