Delhi High Court
FAO/560/2001 of ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. Vs SURAJ PRAKASH VERMA on 8 December 2004
IN TIIE HIGII COIIRT OF DELHI lIT NEW I'ELIII FAO 560/2001 & cM.LOr4/?OOr ORIEIVIAL INSURAIICE CO.UID "' Appellant Through Mr. P.K.Seth, Advocate' VCTSLTS SURAI PRAKASH \IERMA ..... Respondent Through IVIr.VinaY Kumar wittl' IlIr. Anil Kumar Ttrakur, Advocates' 9b CORADI: IION'BLE MR.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
H.C.D.-I [(a) ][Continuation ][Sheet]
?2
Court in Natonal Insurdnce Companyr [Ltd. ][Vs. ][Nlcolletta]Rohat$ 2OOZ tA SCC 456.. Ttre [InsurEm.ce ][Company ][ts ][debarred]from chaltenging the quantum of compensaton [ln ][the]circumstances of this case ir: hand. [Counsel, however, ][contend.s]that ttre award is even beyond that rvtrich [was claimed. ][The]setfled posiflon of lavrr novr is ttrat the [Tribr-rnal ][can award ][higper],-1award ttran claimed if the same is [proved.]Tflith the above observafion, FAO 560/2001 [ts ][dismissed.]M.10I /2OOL is also dismissed.62A6.-62A7Ttrese applicaflons ar€ allowedand disposed of in view ofabove order.DECEMBER [()8, ]2OO4bpAO 560/2001page 2 of 2