Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/12328/2022 of MANGA SINGH AND ANR. Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 30 December 2022
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (126) CRWP-12328-2022. Date of Decision:-30.12.2022. Manga Singh and another ……Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ……Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Present: Mr. Vishal Mittal, Advocate
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT.CHANDIGARH
(126) CRWP-12328-2022Date of Decision:-30.12.2022.
Manga Singh and another
—__- Petitione
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...... Respond
CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE.ALOK JAIN
FE FE
Present:Mr. Vishal Mittal, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Deepanjay Sharma, DAG, Punjab.
FE FE
ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)
The present petition has been filed for seeking protection of)
life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos.4 to 9, whoare the relatives of petitioner No.2.
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI)Inderjit Singh, submits that the matter is being looked into and the|statement of the father of petitioner No.1 has been recorded but respondent|Nos.4 to 9 have not yet been contacted.
At this stage, issuance of notice of motion shall not serve any|fruitful purpose, rather, this Court is of the view that let the petition be|disposed of directing respondent Nos.2 and 3, who are already looking intothe matter to decide the representation dated 26.12.2022 (Annexure P-5).
After considering the abovesaid facts and without commenting|upon the legality of the marriage and expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the present Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of with direction torespondent No.2 to look into the representation (Annexure P-5) and after|considering the threat perception to the petitioners, respondent No.2 will|take appropriate action in accordance with law.
It is, however, clarified that this order shall not debar the State|from proceeding against the petitioners, if involved in any case.
(ALOK JAIN)JUDGEDecember 30, 2022.|Sandeep|Whether speaking/reasoned:-Yes/NoWhether Reportable:-Yes/No