Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/50096/2017 of DEV RAJ AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 29 December 2017
(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.106 CRM-M-50096-2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 29.12.2017 Dev Raj and another ..... Petitioners VERSUS State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL Present: Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CRM-M-50096-2017 (O&M) 1 |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
Sr. No. 10
CRM-M-50096-2017 (O&M)Date of decision : 29.12.2017
Dev Raj and another
—__ Petitioners
VERSUS.
State of Punjab and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL
Present:Mr. Charanpreet Singh, Advocate ©for the petitioners. ©
FE FE
SUDHIR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
The present petition has been filed seeking protection of lifeand liberty of the petitioners, who are allegedly feeling threatened byrespondents No.3 to 6. |
Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. AbhaypalSingh Gill, AAG, Punjab, who is present in the Court, accepts notice onbehalf of State. Let three copies of the petition be supplied to him during thecourse of the day. |
In view of the nature of the order that is being passed, there isno requirement of service upon the private respondents or to seek their reply.Respondent No.2 is directed to go into the allegations made in the complaint(Annexure P-3) and to take appropriate action as may be deemed fit, inaccordance with law, in case, any cognizable offence is found to have been CRM-M-50096-2017 (O&M) 2 |
committed. The appropriate action may be taken within a period of two weeks from receipt of a certified copy of this order. —
The petition is disposed of.
(SUDHIR MITTAL)
JUDGE|
December 29, 2017Ramandeep SinghWhether speaking / reasonedYes/NoWhether ReportableYes/ No