Gujarat High Court
ITR/335/1983 of COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs ARUNA MILLS LTD. on 29 November 1996
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 335 OF 1983 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat-I, Ahmedabad .. Applicant Versus The Aruna Mills Limited., Ahmedabad .. Rajkot Date of Decision : 29th November 1996 For Approval and Signature THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 335 OF 1983
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Gujarat-I, Ahmedabad��� .. Applicant
Versus
The Aruna Mills Limited., Ahmedabad .. Rajkot Date of Decision : 29th November 1996
For Approval and Signature
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. ABICHANDANI
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BALIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of Judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
Mr. M.J. Thakore instructed by Mr. Manish R. Bhatt for applicant Mr.D.A. Mehta with Mr. R.K. Patel with Mr. B.D. Karia for respondent Coram : R.K. Abichandani and Rajesh Balia, JJ
Oral Judgement (Per R.K. Abichandani, J)
1. The following question has been referred to us for our opinion under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act:
"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in coming to the conclusion that the amounts paid to the Managing Director for reimbursement of Medical expenses was liable to be excluded while computing disallowances under Section 40(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961."
2. The question referred to us is covered by the decision of this Court in Gujarat Steel Tubes Limited vs. C.I.T. reported in 210 ITR 358 in which it was held that reimbursement of medical expenses incurred by the directors is a benefit to a Director within the meaning of Section 40(c)(i) of the Act. Following the ratio of this decision, we are of the opinion that the Tribunal was not right in coming to the conclusion that the amounts paid to the Managing Director for reimbursement of medical expenses were liable to be excluded while computing disallowances under Section 40(c) of the Act. The question referred to us is therefore, answered in the negative and in favour of the revenue. The reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
***