Delhi High Court
W.P.(C)/12245/2016 of JAI BALAJI INDUSTRIES LIMITED Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS on 30 December 2016
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12245/2016 JAI BALAJI INDUSTRIES LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Devashish Bharuka & Mr. Vivek Paul Oriel, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anurag
$~4.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 12245/2016
JAI BALAJI INDUSTRIES LIMITED
..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Devashish Bharuka & Mr. Vivek Paul Oriel, Advocates. Advocate along with Mr. Devashish Bharuka & Mr. Vivek Paul Oriel, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS
..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC and Ms. Nisha Sharma, Advocate along with Mr. Vivek Bharadwaj, Nominated Authority, for respondents No.1 to 3/ UOI. Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Sanjeev Kapoor, Mr. Rajat Jariwal, Mr. Sahil Narang & Mr. Shikhar Khare, Advocates for respondent No.4. Ms. Nisha Sharma, Advocate along with Mr. Vivek Bharadwaj, Nominated Authority, for respondents No.1 to 3/ UOI. Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Sanjeev Kapoor, Mr. Rajat Jariwal, Mr. Sahil Narang & Mr. Shikhar Khare, Advocates for respondent No.4.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
%
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
30.12.2016
C.M. No.48308/2016
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 12245/2016 and C.M. No.48307/2016
Issue notice. Notice is accepted by Mr. Ahluwalia on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3/ UOI and by Mr. Sanjeev Kapoor on behalf of respondent No.4.
Mr. Srinivasan has tendered in Court an additional affidavit, which is taken on record.
During the course of arguments, it has been pointed out that the petitioner has alternate efficacious remedy of approaching the Tribunal constituted under the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition & Development) Act, 1957 under Section 27 of the Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015. On instructions from the Nominated Authority, learned counsel representing the UOI has stated that this Tribunal is functioning.
In view of the aforesaid, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, wishes to withdraw the present writ petition and approach the said Tribunal to ventilate the petitioner’s grievances.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
It goes without saying that the decision taken by the Government on 20.12.2016, which is impugned before this Court, if assailed before the said Tribunal, shall be examined on its own merits by the Tribunal.
Dasti.
DECEMBER 30, 2016 B.S. Rohella
VIPIN SANGHI, J