CONTEMPT None on 30 September 1996

$~21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+CONT.CAS(C) 911/2018

RADHARANJAN PATTANAIK

..... Petitioner

Through:Mr. Kumar Rajesh Singh, Mrs.PunamSingh, Mrs.Shabani Chakraborty andMs. Rakesh Mishra, Advocates.Singh, Mrs.Shabani Chakraborty andMs. Rakesh Mishra, Advocates.

versus

S K PATTANAYAK, SECRETARY & ORS

..... RespondentsThrough:Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr.Sanjiv KumarSaxena,Mr.M.K.Tiwari,Mr.Abhishek Rana and Mr. RamneekMishra, Advocates for R-1 to R-3.Mr.SamarBansal,Mr.AnandhVenkataramani,Mr.VinayakMehrotra,AdvocatesalongwithMr.AshokKumarMahato,JointRegistrar, Legal Cell and Mr.DaibakiNandan, DAS, AR (Accounts) for R-4to R-6.Saxena,Mr.M.K.Tiwari,Mr.Abhishek Rana and Mr. RamneekMishra, Advocates for R-1 to R-3.Mr.SamarBansal,Mr.AnandhVenkataramani,Mr.VinayakMehrotra,AdvocatesalongwithMr.AshokKumarMahato,JointRegistrar, Legal Cell and Mr.DaibakiNandan, DAS, AR (Accounts) for R-4to R-6.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLAO R D E R%17.01.2020

CM APPL. 13546/2019 (for restoration) & 15233/2019 (for modificationof order dated 25.03.2019)

During the course of hearing, Mr. Bansal, ld. counsel for theUniversity i.e. Vishwa Bharati University, submits that the applicant whoretired on 30.09.1996 has been released the pensionary benefits besides thepayment of arrears. Ld. counsel for the applicant/petitioner states that he has no instructions in that regard.

The instant contempt petition came to be filed alleging non-paymentof the pensionary benefits. In the event, any other retiral benefit is remainingoutstanding and payable by the respondents, the petitioner should make arepresentation to the University i.e. Vishwa Bharati University, in the firstinstance and should he have any surviving grievance, it shall be open to thepetitioner to have recourse to the remedy(ies) as may be available under law.With the above observations, the applications are disposed of.

JANUARY 17, 2020nn

A. K. CHAWLA, J