Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/64712/2018 of JOTI RANI AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 31 December 2018
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-64712-2018 Date of decision: 31.12.2018 Joti Rani and another ….Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN Present: Mr. Gursewak Singh, Advocate for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CRM-M-647 12-201
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
CRM-M-64712-2018
Date of decision: 31.12.2018
Joti Rani and another
... Petitione
Versus
State of Punjab and others
... Responden
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present:Mr. Gursewak Singh, Advocatefor the petitioners, KOK OK
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN,J.(Oral)
The petitioners have approached this Court seeking protectionof their life and liberty on the premise that petitioner No.1 has pertormedmarriage with petitioner No.2 against the wishes of her parents and otherfamily members and the petitioners are apprehending threat to their life andliberty at their instance.
Notice of motion.
On asking of the Court, Ms. Rameeza Hakeem, Addl. AG,Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that arepresentation dated 26.12.2018 was made to the Senior Superintendent ofPolice, Patiala (Annexure P-5) seeking necessary protection but no actionhas been taken so far in the matter.
CRM-M-647 12-201
Heard.
Without examining the question of validity or otherwise ofmarriage of the petitioners, the present petition stands disposed of with adirection to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala to look intogrievance of the petitioners expressed in the representation (Annexure P-5)and take appropriate action, if any, warranted in the circumstances.
The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala is further directedto arrange a meeting of respondent No.4 with petitioner No.1 in case anysuch application is moved.
It is made clear that in case any FIR is registered againstpetitioner No.2, it will be open for the police authorities to take action, inaccordance with law.
31.12 27018vishnu
|}ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN |JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasonedYes/NoWhether reportableYes/No