Gujarat High Court
SCR.A/908/1999 of MOHMED BASIR MOHMED SIDDIQ @ BABLU Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 5 November 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 908 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 908 of 1999
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- MOHMED BASIR MOHMED SIDDIQ @ BABLUVersus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: None present for Petitioner MR SK PATEL, APP for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 05/11/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. I have my own reservations on the merits of the impugned order, but at this stage, I do not consider it to be appropriate to release the petitioner on furlough leave. However, he shall be free to file fresh application within a period of six months from the date of the impugned order. In case such an application is filed, at that point of time, it is expected of the authority to consider the same impartially and without keeping in mind that the petitioner is convicted for offence of murder of police constable.
2. Subject to these observations, this Special Criminal Application is dismissed. Rule discharged. No order as costs.
�����(S.K.Keshote,J.)
(pathan)