CS(OS)/451/1996 of TINNA ENTERPRISES LTD Vs TINNA EXPORTS LTD on 27 February 1996

Q„1

Ans„

Q.2

Ans,

Digitally Signed By:AMULYACertify that the digital file andphysical file have been compared andthe digital data is as per the physicalfile and no page is missing.

08.05.96

S.Mq.450/86

DW-2

kishoreFiECALLEDFOF^CF<OSS--bX^INATIONBY SHRI T»K„GANJULEARNEDCOUNSELFDRTHEPLAINTIFFS.

ONS„A=

Mr J<ishorepleasetellto thisHon'bleCourtthatisityourcasethatagreementtoselldated02 . :l, 1 « 1983(ExhibitPW1 /2 )waxs si gn edbyyouon 1 yforthepurposeo-fplaintiff'sobtainingloanfrom'HDFC.?

Yes,.

MrcKishoreis it yoursamecasewithrespecttothedocument(ExhibitPW2/21)whichistheagreementtoselldated02,. 11,1982inSuitNo.453/86?

Yes „Mr.Kishore,1 put it to youthattheExhibitPWl/2recordsthatyouhadreceivedRs.l„70lakhsin SuitNo. 451/86and ExhibitPWl/21which is theagreementto sellin SuitNo.450/86recordsthatyouhad feceived1.80lakhsbut you receivedtheseamounttowardspart considerationof the sale -2-S.No.450/86

priceQtthetwoplats,whatdoyousayaboutthis?

Ans„Ihadreceivedasanadvance,

(3 u4Mr „l<ishorepleasetelltothisHon '' b 1 eCourtthatdoesExhibitPW 1/2bearyoursignatures?thatdoesExhibitPW 1/2bearyoursignatures?

Ans„Yes.

D,5Mr=Kishore,pleasealsotelltothisHon'bleCourtthatdcoumentExhibitPW2/21(agreementtosell)inSuitMo.450/S6doesitbearyoursignature?CourtthatdcoumentExhibitPW2/21(agreementtosell)inSuitMo.450/S6doesitbearyoursignature?

Ans»Yes.

Q.6Pleasealsosee?ExhibitP-9,,thebuildingpl£\nhasbeenannexedwiththeExhibitPWl/2doesitalsobeenannexedwiththeExhibitPWl/2doesitalso bearyoursignatures?

Ans.Yes„

Q„'7Mr.KishoreinthesameExhibit,i.e.ExhibitP-?,thebuildingplanisshownhereis itasperthesanctionedbuildingplan?thebuildingplanisshownhereis itasperthesanctionedbuildingplan?

Ans.No.

Q.SMr,Kishorehaveyoumade constructioncontrarytothesanctionedplan?thesanctionedplan?

-

3-S.No.450/86

Ans«

Ihavediverted•fromthesanctionedplanand

withinthelimitedbye-laws»

Q„9

Mr»Kishore,Iput it to youthatthe plaintiffinSuitMo.451/86hadnevertoldyouthatshewantedtoapplyforaloanfromHDFCpwhatdoyousayaboutthis?

Ans.Thatis notcorrect.

Q,10

Ans.

Iputittoyou thatason02.11.19B3,theplaintiffin SuitNo.451/86havepaidtoyouatotalamountofRs.3.55lakhswhichincludedthelaonamountgivento youand as suchtherecouldbeno necessityforapplyingHDFCloan;,whatdoyou sayaboutthis?Thatisnotcorrect.

Q.ll

Ans„

Mr.Kishore.,Iput ittoyouthatonlyAdml .Soodtheplaintiffin SuitNo.450/86hadappliedforloanfromHDFCandhadalsodepositedanagreementtosell(ExhibitPW2/21)withtheHDFCwhatdoyousayaboutit?T.haveto saythatyouhavenowadmittedincourtthatyourequiredanagreementto selltotakeloanfromHDFCandthusto covermy interest;thelastpageoftheagreementwhichyouhavesignedjyouhaveconcealedinthecourtandthetotalof *

thisvalueonthelastpageisthesameasinE-lKhibitD~&identical.SinceMr.Soodfiledaffidavitcollectedbythe attorneycoveredtheothersuitflatalsowhichhehadadmitted.

Q.12Mr.Kishoreyouhavedeposedthatyouusedto takecashamountfromtheprcDspectivebuyersbe.foresigningtheagreementtosell,whatwastheproportionof thiscashamounttothe costoftheflat?

Ans.YesItookcash.

Q.13Iput it toyou thatthe plaintiffsinboththesuithadneveragreedtopayanyamountin cashtoyouforthetwoflats,,is it correct?Ans.Idenyit«

Q.14Mr.Kis ho rec£\nyousaywha\twastheca\shamountdemandedby youfromthe plaintiffsinboththesuits?

Ans.Ido notwantto divulgeit.

Q.15Mr.Kishorecanyou saywhatwasthecashamountreceivedbyyoufromDefendantno,6,MadhuJ a v r a n i ,iM . K .Va c h h a n iJ o 11 yS u d e r s iia nKu ma r ,andSmt.KaramKaurSebletowhomyouhavesoldthef 1 a t si nt h eb u i 1 d i n g ?

Ans„Idonotwantto divulge.

Q.16Mr.I<is ho re didyouaic count-forthesecashamountintheaccountbooks?intheaccountbooks?Ans.Ido notwantto divulge.

Q.l/"Mr.Kishore,Iput ittoyouthatyouhavenotaccounted-foranycashamountreceived-fromthesepersons?accounted-foranycashamountreceived-fromthesepersons?Ans.Idenythesuggestion.Q.18Mr.Kishorsjpleaseproducethepowero-fattorneyg i veni nyou r+a\vou rbyd e -fen d antno. 6?Q.18Mr.Kishorsjpleaseproducethepowero-fattorneyg i veni nyou r+a\vou rbyd e -fen d antno. 6?Ains.Ihavealreadyfiledthepowerof attorneygiventomeby defendant^4o.6andmarkedasExhibitDWl/1.tomeby defendant^4o.6andmarkedasExhibitDWl/1./Q.19HaveyouidentifiedthesignaturesofdefendantNo6?No6?Ans.Yes.

T

Q.20Is defendantNo.6awareoftheproceedingsin thisCourt?Ans.Yes.Q,21Pleaseseethedocumentwhichisagreementtosell.Is itapartof ExhibitPW2/11andis itthe f -S.No.450/86

agreementta sellentereduponbyde-fend antWoaiiwithyou5is itthesameagreement,whatdoyousayaboutthis?

Ans„Yesand it is signedbyme.

Q . 24Didyour•ec:e i vebo t ht hepymen tsbyc hequeorbycash?Ans.E-ioththepaymentswerereceivedbymebybankdraft.

Q.25Pleaseseet he statemen tad vanc erec ei vedbyyoufromflatbuyersgivenbyyoualongwithyourIncomeTa;-;return,,is itcorrect?

7S.No.450/86

Ans«Thisis suittorspecificpsr-forma\ncewhatIdidandwh£\tIda withmy propertywithotherbuyersisnothingtodowiththissuit»

[3 «26Mr „ KishoreIrepeatthesamequestionwi threg ardto otherreturnsasonDecember31^1986,December31,1987(thesearee;-:hibitsDWl/3andDW1/4)whatdoyousayaboutthesereturns?

f-A n s.N oc o m m fs n t sr

R > LiS':A « C

MayB,1996Ban•

K:Ra ma mo o r t h y ,J

/

"8-

08,05„96

AT3 . 30pm „

S.Nq.450/86

DW--2

DW-~2S =B»KI SHORERECALLEDFORCROSS-EXAMINATIONBYSHRIT„K„(3ANJLILEARNEDCOUNSELFORTHEPLAINTIFFS, ONS„A„

Q„27 • Mr„Kishoreis it correcttha\tyouhavefiledForm'54Awi-threspecttotheagreementtosellofDefendantNo.6on21,8„1985?•Ans»Idonotrememberthedatebutaftergivingpossessionand getting.thesaleregisteredeveryonehastofileForm34A.

(3.28Isit correctthatthe financialyearwhichyou.aremaintaininginyourbooksofaccountsstartsfromIstJanuaryandendingon 3l5tDecember?A n s «Id on o tk n o w „

Q,29Iput it to you thatin yourreturnfortheyearendingDecember31p1984thereisnomentionofanyadvanceamountreceivedfromdefendantNo,6?Ans„Thatyoucanaskmy CharteredAccountant, —

Q„3t5Iput it toyauthatIncomeTaxf^eturnending31 stDecember19E55showsthatyouhavereceivedanamountofRs. •1„20lakhsfromdefendantNo.6,isitcorrect?Ans.If itisshownintheincometa;-;returnitmustbecorrect.

Q .. 31Ip LI.iti tt oy o ut ha ts a me isthep o s i t i o nwi t hrespecttoIncomeTa;-:Returnfortheyearending1986and1987?

An s „Myac c oun tan tk n owsi t.Id an o tk n ov), Q.32Mr.i<is ho re areyoumaintainingbooksof accounts?An s uMyC h a t e r e dAc c o u n t a n tk n o wsit.

Q,33Isi tcorrectthatMr.G.R.Partif i1edmortgagesuitbeingSuitNo.905/82sigainstyou?

Ans.Itisfiledandcleared,

Q . 3 4Is itc a r r e c tt ha tt he suitp r o pe r t yt ina tisA-13 jGreenParkNewDelhi,wasmortgagedbyyouinfavourofMr.6.R.Parthi?Ans.Itwasmortgagedandsubsequentlypaidoff.

Q.35Iput it toyou thatthissuitwascompromisedby

S.No.450/86

thisCompromisedApplicc\tion5404/33inSuitNo.905/82,,a certifiedcopyo-f whichis shownto you, whatdoyousayaboutthis?Ans„Thecerti-Fiedcopyshowntome isthecompromiseapplication-filedinthe^ proceedingsandthesameisExhibitDWl/5, Gi. 36

i.

Iputittoyouthattermo-fthiscompromiseapplicationyouhavegivenasecuritybondtotheRegistraro-fthisCourt,certi-fiedcopyofwhichisshowntoyou,whatdoyousayaboutthis?

Ans»The securitybond(atcopyofwhichisshowntome)iscorrectandmarkedas ehibitDW1 /6 .

Q.37Mr.KishoreIput ittoyouthatintermofthissecuritybondflatMo.S--4measuring7'13sq.ftwasgivenasasecuritybyyouon27.10.1983,isitcorrect?Ans.Yes.

Q«3BIput ittoyouthatthemortgageinfavourofMr.Q . R .P-ar t h iwasr ed eemedbyeecu t iono fredemptiondeeddated2Z'. 03. 1985 ,whichismarkedas ExhibitPW 2/6,is it correct?Ans.Mustbecorrect.

~11-S.No.450/86

Q.39Iputittoyouthatpriorto23.03„1985,youcouldnothavesoldthe-FlatNo.S3--4 toanybody,whatdoyousayaboutthis?couldnothavesoldthe-FlatNo.S3--4 toanybody,whatdoyousayaboutthis?

Ans.Isoldthe-flatinAugust1984»

Q.40Mr,Kishorepleasesee exhibitP-9whichisabuild'ingplanin SuitWo „ 451/£i'6whatdoyousaybuild'ingplanin SuitWo „ 451/£i'6whatdoyousay aboutthis?

Ans.Yes,Itiscorrect,

Q , 41Wh a ti st h eare as h sownintinepi a noff 1 a tNo ,S - 4?

Ans,7''13. 50 sq „-ft,

Q,42Mr,Kishoreisthereaxnytlaitbythenumber8-5inthebuilding?thebuilding?

Ans,No,

Q ,3Ip u.ti tt oy o ut h a i:a sp e r•t h ea p provedb u i 1 d i n qplanthereisnoflsitS-4shownothe-first-floorplanthereisnoflsitS-4shownothe-first-floor -ft h eb u i 1 d i n g ?

An s ,' No ,No tona n y-f1a or .

Gi, 44Whatdoesletter' S'in-flatNo,S-4stand-for?Ans,Ido notknow,architect.Hemadetheplan.Ans,Ido notknow,architect.Hemadetheplan.

4k

Q.45Iput ittoyouthatde-fend?.iitMo„6hadbookedFlatF--4onthe-first-Floor,is it correct?FlatF--4onthe-first-Floor,is it correct?

Ans,Itisnotcorrect.HeneverbookedF~4n

Q»46Youhadriledyourwrittenstatementin SuitNo.165/85inthe DistrictCourt,a certifiedcopyo-fwhichisshowntoyoupleaseseeandtelltothis165/85inthe DistrictCourt,a certifiedcopyo-fwhichisshowntoyoupleaseseeandtelltothis i-lo n ' b 1 eC o u r ti si 'tt h es a m e ?

Ans»

Yes.it issicjnedbyme.Thesameismaxdebyme.Thecopyismarkedas ExhibitDW 1/7.Thecopyismarkedas ExhibitDW 1/7.

C3.47Mr.KishorejIput ittoyouthatinyourvMrittenstatementintheLowerCourt.,thereisno ja1legactionmade by you that the last paige o-fthe //documentE-IxhibitDF'Wlwasretainedbyyouwhatdoyouhavetosayaboutthis?

Ans.Thatwasnotnecessary

Q.48Iput ittoyouthatinyourwrittenstatementintheLowerCourtyouhavestatedthatthecopyofthedocumentmarkedExhibitD(4P iwasgiventotheplainti-f-f?

Ans.

Ineverstatedso.

G! .49

Ip u ti tt oy o ut h a tt h edoc u me n tE ;< h i b i tDP W1wa s ^

. Ans„

Q.50

Ans.

Q.51

Ans.

neitheracteduponnorwas agreedto bedestroyedby youwhatdo youhaveto say about.it?Ineveragredto destroythisdocumentalongwithpage5=The agreementto sellwhichtheattorneyhasdeniedhere is of4 pagesand5thpageismissingwhichhe admittedon4.3.1987inthisCourt.Thisagreementwasmeantto getloanfromHDFC as is evidentfromAnne;;ureattachedwithIA11159/95 and llle)0/95whereinthey have not deni'edthedocumentsinreplywhichamountsto admission.Iam notboundby thatagreementDPWl.

Iput it toyou thatthe agreementto selldated02.11.1933whichis ExhibitPWl/2andExhibitPiAl2/21is the similaragreementexecutedbyyouwithotherflatbuyerswhatdo youhavetosayaboutit?The differencebetweenyouragreementto sellandtheotheragreementto sellsignedbytheotherpeoplewas agreementto selllastpageattachedwith otherflatbuyerdo nothavethe lastpage, Pleasesee exhibitPWl/2,agreementto selldated02.11.1983whichisthelastpageyouarereferring,whatdoyou sayaboutit?-Thisdocumentdoesnothavethe lastpage.

(3.52On page5 arethereyour signature?Ans.Yes„Thisi.smy signatureondocumentDPWlatpage5=•

Q„53Mr„ KishoreI put it to v;ou thatthe plainti-ffhadneverrequestedyouto adjusttheloanamountgivento you againstthe allegedcashpaymentwhatdoyouhaveto sayaboutit?

r-*Ans»Thatisthemistaketheyhavemadebygivinq. prayerNo«3in the plaintwhatmeaningtheywantedtoby -flataspertheagreementtosellwhichIhavedenieditn G!. 54Mr.KishoreI put it to youthartagreementto selldated02.11.19S3beingExhibitPW 1/2andPW2/21^con-^J.rmandirrevocableagreementandthereis nothingtheprovisionalaboutit?

Ans.Thisisno agreementto sellat allasIhavealreadyexplainedbecauseo-l" the lastpageIhavenolegalbinding.Q.55Whendidyou shiftto your-?lat atA™13,GreenP a r k ,,N'e w Del h i ?Ans.Sometimein1984.

t

A

Ll..56kihi ch i s t i-ie f .1 at occ: Lipi ed by you?Ans.G-1A-13,GreenPark,New Delhi.Q.57Pleasepoint out what is it thatisprovisionalaboutthesetwo agreementsbeingExhibitPWl/2 andPW2/21?<Ans,The reply is dcoument DPIa!'!''-^" SuitMo. 451/86andothej;-replyis as per the orderdated4 =3. 1987 „Q-b8Iputit to you thatin theIncomeTaxReturn*•filedby you -for the yearsending1982-87you havenot shown the amounts .receivedby you in cash-fromo t he i" T1a tbu y e r s ?

Ans,,I denythe suggestion.

Q.>j9Iput it to you thatyou neverreturnedtheloanamountgivento youby boththeplainti-F-Fs?Ans.I denythe suggestion.

R.U.&.A.CMay8,1996Ban

K.Ka ma mo o r t h v ,J

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFDELHI

Suit

No.451/86

Oiate..,D±..decij;

MI'-s»y i j a y aS r i v a b t a v aF' 1 a i n t i f -ft h r o u g hW/ DB r i g „p-'. i--;«S r i v a s t a v aDr.S.Ghosh,Sr.J-43-'A,SouthE;>:teF^ion5A d V o c a t Gw i t hPart-IMr.T.K,Ganjuf\lewDelhiuAdvocate.

Vers-us

M/ G.Mi r a h u 1E n t e r p r-i s e sDe-fendants1to5ap a r t n e r s h i pf i r mt h r Du g hd 0 -i- e ri d a n thavingitsprincipalNo.2.oibusinessatAnne^BA-13,,GreonF-'arkE;-:tn =D ef e n d a n tIMo.6NewDelhi--ilO016.throughMemD.tobe servedthroughitsMa n a g i rj gp a r t n e rSh„S.B.Kishore.S h .S . B.K i s h D r e ,S / o1 a t eDr .F-v. B.Ra mKi s h o r e,Managingpartnerofde-fend^intNo,R/oA-13,GreenParkExtension,NewDe 1 hi i -1 10016 ,S iT!i"..i-:u s u ffI k;i s h o r e,i'J / oS h .3. B .I-:: i s h o r e ,F-'artnero-fdefendantNo.lR/oA-IS,GreenParkExtension.NewDei hi--110016.ap a r t n e r s h i pf i r mt h r Du g hd 0 -i- e ri d a n thavingitsprincipalNo.2.oibusinessatAnne^BA-13,,GreonF-'arkE;-:tn =D ef e n d a n tIMo.6NewDelhi--ilO016.throughMemD.tobe servedthroughitsMa n a g i rj gp a r t n e rSh„S.B.Kishore.S h .S . B.K i s h D r e ,S / o1 a t eDr .F-v. B.Ra mKi s h o r e,Managingpartnerofde-fend^intNo,R/oA-13,GreenParkExtension,NewDe 1 hi i -1 10016 ,S iT!i"..i-:u s u ffI k;i s h o r e,i'J / oS h .3. B .I-:: i s h o r e ,F-'artnero-fdefendantNo.lR/oA-IS,GreenParkExtension.NewDei hi--110016.

4 .S h ,f;:a hiu 1l< i s h o r e ,S/oSh.S.B-Kishore,Par tnei-oi-de-l'endan•(:No . 1R/oA--13,GreenParkL~>:tension,Nev#De 1 h i -110016 ,S/oSh.S.B-Kishore,Par tnei-oi-de-l'endan•(:No . 1R/oA--13,GreenParkL~>:tension,Nev#De 1 h i -110016 , 5 .i'^'ii s sc3i ini r-ai<i s h o r e ,,D / oS h .S. Ei.K i s h o re.PartnerofdefendantNo.lR/oA--13,GreenParkExtension,N e wD e 1 [i i --110' Ci16 „D / oS h .S. Ei.K i s h o re.PartnerofdefendantNo.lR/oA--13,GreenParkExtension,N e wD e 1 [i i --110' Ci16 „

6. Sh.S.S.iiohd.Airshad 5S / o11 eS h.S. S. II o f"id .Ab d u 11 a i*!PartnerofdefendantNo.lS / o11 eS h.S. S. II o f"id .Ab d u 11 a i*!PartnerofdefendantNo.l S.Nd.451/86

R/dA-135isreenParkE>;t.BnB,iDn,NewDel hi •••-no016 =andalsoat44.,Dr.B.N.RBcidyRoad 5"i"h e y a g a n a y aNa g a 1- ,Madra5-17„

AND

SUITNO.450/36RearAdml .RishiRajSood„f"' 1 a i n t i -f-ft ho u g hS/olateSh=H.C.SoodDr.S.Ghosh 3 Sr„presentlyatNavyJ-iouse,AdvocatewithPortBlalr^Mr»T,K.GanjuthroughhisSpecialAttorneyAdvocate=Brig „K „i<. Srivastava(Retd.)

Versus

M/s.MirahulEnterprisesDbtendantsthrouqhapartnership-firmdefendantNo.2„havingitsprincipalofbusinessatAnnexeA-13 jGe e nF a r kEt n .NewDelhi,-110016»totaeservedthroughitsManagingpartnerSh.Kishore,Sh„S„B„Kishore,S / o1 a t eDr „i-i:.Ei,Ra m i<i s i'lo r e,ManagingpartnerofdefendantNo.lR/oA"-i3,GreenParkExtension^NewDei hi"i10016„S IT!t.i<u s u iTiKi s hiDr e jW/oSh-S.B.Kishore,PartnerofdefendantNo „ 1R/oA--13,,GreenParkExtensionNewDelhi-110016.S i"!.Ra h u 1i<i s h o r e ,S / oS i'l,S, B .K i s i-io r e,F' a r t n e ro td e f e n d a n -t'.i'^io. 1R/oA-13fGreenParkExtension,NewBel hi--l 10 016.Mi B 5S i ffi i r aK i s h o r e ,D/ oS h .3 . B „k.'i s h o 1-e,P a r t n e ro -fd e f e n d a n tNo. 1R/oA--13|,GreenF-'ark Extension,NewDei hi-110016.

S3;S.No.451/86

CORAM

Hon'bleMr.JustisceK.RAMAMOORTHY

;i. „(.»jhBthBrReportBrsoflocalpapersmaybe allowedto seethejudgment?

2»Tobe re -fer recJtot he Repor teror not?3.,WhethertheirLordshipswishto seethe-fairopy ofthejudgment?

K.RAMAMOORTHY.J.

1„Mrs.VijayaSrivastavais theplainti-f-finsuitNo.451/86.RearAdmiralR„R.Soodistheplainti-f-finsuitNd„450/86,,Brig,K.KnSrivasta-v'ahasgi-v-ene'v'idenceonbehal-f.ofhiswi-feSmt.VijaySrivastavaandRearAdmiralR,R.Soodasthoughhiswi-l-eSmt.-Vij^^-yaSriastavawasalsoexaminedasP.W.I.Theplainti-ffinsuitWo.451/86ishereinafterre-t-erredto as'Vandtheplainti-f-fin suitMo.450/36ishereina-i-terre-ferredtoas'S'.De-fendants1to5arehereeina-fterre-ferredtoasthesecondde-f-endant.Thoughorale-videnceisrecordedin suitiMo.451/86,documentshavebeenmarkedinboththe suitsseparatelytowhich1shallre-fertothe;mattheappropriatestages,,.Defendants1to5arecommontothetwo-suitsandthereisthe6thdefendantinsuitiMo.451/86.Thisfactsarealmostsameand,thereforepthetwosuitsarebeingdisposedofbythis.commonjudqmentinsuitNo.451/86.

K

2. Attheoutset,Ihaveto statethatthesetwocasesaretypical,ofthepartiestryingtooverreachtheotherandastheonecouldnotwinthedayagainstthe othertheyarebeforethisCourt.Inor aboutthebeginningof1932thes e c o n dd e f e n d a n tHr .S »Bi<.i. s h o r eh a da p p r o a c h e d'Va.nd'S'offeringto sellflatsinhisCoiTiplexjr-andbyE;;.F-'u9 hewouldappeartohaveobtainedsanctionofthepla.nforthe constructionoftheflats.On16.7,1982'VhadpaidasumofRS.IO5OOO/-asadvancetowardsthepriceoftheflat.On7 .,1.1933(£;•;,P „ 17)thesec on dd e fen dan tissued• .I•acertificatetothefol lowingeffect; "Thisisto certifythatSmt.VijayaSrivastavaW/o Brig.K J<.SrivastavaresidingatJ-43A,NDSE Part1,NewD e 1 h i - 4 9h a isb c>o i-: e dar e s i d e n t i a 1fiatmeasuring1369sq.ft.inMirahulApartmentsasperdrawingattachedatapproximatecostofRs. 411354/--".

Alongwiththis,theseconddefendanthadgiventhedrawingEi-i.-P.lS.Asperthis,thereisnocontractbutP.W.I(9)andF.l'\l.2EO-'ig.K.K.Srivastavahadspokenaboutthisasaconfirmedarrangement.On8.2,1933\E;;.P. 16)seconddefendantwrotetoP. i>i, 2requestinghimtoaskMr„'S'whohadtakenflatS-4tosendasumofRs.75,000/-.On2.5.1933(E>!.P.14)secondt; e f e n d a n twr•o t et. cjMr s .' V 'i nt h efol 1 o wi n g AI- :5:S.Wd.451/36

tGrms!-

"Furthertoourletterof10.4„S3andsutasE-quentseveralrequeststomakepaymentandhavetheagreementtosellfinalisedtautyouhavefailedtocomplyto ourneeds.Itisherebynotifiedthatby10,5.33kindlymake?paymentdueandhavetheagreementto sellcompletedfailingwe shallcancelyourflatallotmentsandforfeittheadvancegiven."

Onthesamedate(E>;„P„15)theseconddefendant sendsthefollowingcertificaterEtlatinqtoMr, ' 3' 5 - "ThisistoceritifythatRearAdmiralFwR,SoodhasbookedafiatinourMirahulPipartmentsmeasuring713sq„ft,throughMrs.VijaySrivastava.,"

On 9,5.33

(E>:.P. 13)Mrs,'Vwrotethefollowing

totheseconddefendant5-

"Pleaserefertoyourregisteredletteraddressedtome dated2May.1933.

V'ouarefullyawarethatIhavebookedonlyoneflatonthesecondfloorfacingUpharCinemaandhavepaidtoyousufficienta.iTiounttowardsthesameintermsofyouragreementforsale.Wehavealsotriedourbesttopromotethe saleof additionalflatforyourenterpriseswithoutanyprofitmotivesattachedto it.Youhavenowdiscussedthematterdirectlyregardingthe saleofthesecondtwobedroomflatwithAdmiralRishiRaiSoodon3Mayatyourresidence.Hereafterthecorrespondenceregardingsecondflatcanbemadedirectlywithhim.

f

r

Pi easeensurethatinall-futurec.orreEpondsncewithme pleasere-fertoonlyone fiatonsecondflaDrfacingIJpharCine;ma asregardsmybookingis concernedand accountmydepositsaccording 1y„"

On.1.2„b„19S3(E>;.P.i2)seconddefendantv^rotetoMrs='Vin. replyto E;c, P.13 inthefollowingterms5-- "F-ileferenceyourletterof9„5.S3deliveredtousyesterdaykindlynolis?thatwe f'lavecariCG?lledyoursflatsbearingNds„S--2 & S--45 aswehavenotrecd= • yourpaymentbyiO„5.S3toenableustogetthea g r e Bme n tt os e11f i n a 1i sedandhaveforfeitedyouradvanceasperourconditionsof sale.

Howeverweshallreconsidertherevivalof the flattsin caseyoupayyourfullinstalmentsdueby 31.5„33i=e«/OX of the flatvalueorhavethe tlatsrebookedandrecoveryouradvancefromeachflat.fromrebookingas a gestureof goodwill."

On 14»^i„3..:. (Ek .PW.)Mrs,.'V'wroteto the seconddefendantaboutthe discussionshadon13.5.83=The letterreadsas followss- "Pleaserefertoyourdiscussionswithmy husbandon theeveningofi3thMay and yoursubsequentvisittoourhouseon14MayinthemorningwithsomedocumentspertainingtoyourcourtcaseinrespectofRahulFood.Yourrepliesto our querriesarenotveryconvincingandwethereforerequestyou to submitthefo 1.1,owingdocumentstowardsyourlegaltitleinrespectof the1and/bui 1ding'aswellas flatsunderconstructionatAnne^eeA--13 GreenParkExtension,New r>elhi1.1.uv.)1,This is essentialtoremoveanydoubtregardingfraudulent'saleof flats f A

;7sS.Nd.451/86

(b.)WonBncumberar-iCBCertificate•frD{?iappropriateauthorityinr e s pe c to fi a nd / bti i i d i r/g / •!- i a tsituatedatA--13<Annexee)GreenParkEMtsnsionWew Deihi-i6„'

<b)An attestedcopyoi titledeedin respectoflandand building•-A-13(Annexes)GreenParkExtension,NewDelhi-16.i c )An a 11 e f:-;t e d c o py ofpa i*"t ne i-"a i"(i fjdeedinrespectofMirahuiEnterprisesand authoritytosignthesaledeedin respectofflatsunderconstructionatA--13jGreenParkExtensionNewDelhi--16=<d)An affidavitsignedby allthemembersof. yourfamilyasv^ellasanyotherpartnerinllirahulEnterprisesindicatingthatthetitleof thelandandbuildingatA--1(Annexee)GreenParkExterisionhasbeenhandedovertoMirahulEnterprisesforpurposesofconstructingresidentialflatsandsellingthemtopubiic/prospectivebuyers.<e)Mame,addressandaccountnumberofbankersin respectofiiirahulEnterprises,Vouareonceagainrequestedtoexpeditiouslyfurnishmealltheabovementioneddocumentsso astoenterintofinalagreementvviithyoutorthe fiatbookedbyme forwhichIhavealreadyadvancedyouaSLibstantialsumasperreceiptsissuedbyyouandregistrationletterissuedby you„Shouldyou failtosubmit/producethe abovementioneddocumentstomyentiresatisfactionbefore31 Hay,Ishallhaveno otheralternativebutT.Oactasmay beadvisedbymyadvocareI sincerelyhope thatyouhave not mortgagedthispropertyas-claimedby youandA-13GreenParkExtension jisfreefroma.nylitigation,,Should-the factsbeto !S:5.IMP.451/86

tht5contrary,youwiiibe.1 .tabisunderthelawstomakegoodanyIobsandexpenditiArethatIm-ayhavetoincurduetoyouractionsorduetothe direct/indirectactionsofyourfaoiilymembersorpartnersinmirahuienterprises.

Hopeyouwillproducethedocumentsas stipulatedinthisletterbefore31Mayandrefrain-frDmanyactionwhichwiiijeopardise.thesituationr e g a r d i n ga d v a n c ec o 11 e c 'i:e d-fi- o mme. "

r

agreeffientsbetweentheparties.InE>:.F'Wl/2;relevant,preambleportionreadsasfollows "Andwhereasthe Sellershaveagreedtosellandthepurchasershaveagreedtopurchasepsirtportiono-fthebuildingmeasuringapproximatelyJ. 156SCI -,at2nd-f1oor ^f 1atI'^lo»S--2inMirahulApartmentsNev\iDelhiasshownintheplanattachedandmarkedbyaredcolouredboundarysignedbyboththepair ties-forthepurposeo-ffutureveri f ice^tion, "

Clauise

Ioftheagreementreadsasfollowsg™

"1)Thatthe 'sellershave^-lireadyreceivedthesumofIRs.1 „ 70lacsatthetimeofsigningthisAgreementt os e 11a se an e s t.mo n e y .T h a tt f"iesum ofremainingpaymenttowardstheconsiderationistobemadeinthemannerprescribedbelows-- Totalcostofthe'flat'

Rs.26426l/-„"

InE:';-!.DPW. 1 firstfourpagesarethesameasinEx.P,W,1/2butinthe5thpagethereis differenceSin di ti Bs t a t e do v e i-a n da b o v eR s .264,461/asumofRs„i j 71 , •712/-istobepaidby'V,Ine;x.PW2/21agreementbetween'S'andseconddefendanttherelevantpreambleportionreadsasfollowss-•

"Andwhereasthe Sellershaveagreedtosellandthepurchasershaveagreedtopurchasepartportionoft hebu i 1d i n gme a s i.ir i n ga p p r o >! i.ma t.e 1y950sq.ft,,at2ndfloor,flatNo.S-iinHirahulApartments-NewDelhiasshownintheplanattachedandmarkedbyaredcolouredboundarysignedbyboththe^partiesforthe-purposeoffutureverification="

=

S.Nq.451/86

ClauseIoftheaqreementreadsasfol io^MS3•- "l)Thatthe sellershavealreadyreceivedthesumofRs.1.30lacsatthetimeofsigningthisAgreementto sellas earnestmoney„Thatthesumofremainingpaymenttowardstheconsiderationistotaemadeinthema ri n e rp r s s c i" i b e db e 1 o ws - TotalcostofthefiatRs„2,,6S

1 acs."

Ex,P„41dated9„ll.i9£J3receiptfori-kS«10,000/-issuedbyseconddefendantto"v' ,E>:.P.42dated24.11,1983receiptforchequeforRs„10,000/-issuedbyseconddefendantinfavcjurof'v''„E;!.F''«43dated24. 11 „1983receiptforthechequeissuedforRs.15,000/--.E;;.P. 44 dated13.12.83receiptforthechequeforRs.15,000/-.,E;-; „ P. 45dated14.12.83receiptforthechequeforRs,10,000/-.

b«The plaintiff'Vis statedtohavegiveninterestfreeloantoseconddefendantasevidencedby thefollowingdocumentss- E;-:. P. 46dated11 . 2.84Rs .10,000/--bycheque.

E;-;„P.47dated21.3.84Rs.5,000/-bycheque, E;-;„P. 43 dated21.3,84Rs.lS^OOO/-incash.E•;<..F-' „49da ted5,4,. 34F<s „50 ,, 000/-by cheque, E;;.P,50dated19.4,84Rs.'EJjOOO/-bvcheque.

E>;.P.51dated19.4.84Rs .7,,000/-

sllsS.iMo.451/86

by cheque.

E>:„P„52dated6„5.S4Pis.20,000/-incash.E;-;.F''„53dated11.5„S4J.0,000/-incash.E;;„P.54dated23.5.S4F\s.20,000/-bycheqiAB.7.OntheSthofOctoberIS'34(Em.P.7)'Vwrotetotheseconddefendantinthefollowing terms = - "PleaisGrefertoyourtelephonicconversationof7Octwithmyhusbandandconfirriithefollowings-( a )S u il: a b 1 e(lia t e sw h e nt. hieregistrationoffiatscanbefinalised.

<b)i-iuitabledatewhenwecanstartfittingtheflatwitha 1 rn i r a hi,cupboardsetc.

An earlyconfirmationisrequested".

On12=12,1984(El';-:.P.6)theto'V'inthefollowingtermss- (El';-:.P.6)theseconddefendantwrote "Thisisto adviseyoutokindlyhavetheregular'AGREEMENTTOSELL'signedbetweenustoenableustoconfirmtheallotmentofFlatS-2measuringappro;-;.950 sq.ft.inMIRAHULAPARTMENTS„If ' foranyreasonthisis notdoneby31.12,84thenv-je shalltreattheprovisionalallotmentascancelled.

Kindlynotethatanyadvancegivenfarprovisionalbookingof thisflatisnofirmco/Timitmentonourpartf o ra 11 o t .i.n gt h ef 1 a tt oy ouu n 1 e s stheregular'AGREEMENTTOSELL'iss i q n e db e t w e e nu s, "

On15,. 12.19S4(E;-!.F-^.4)'V"wrotetothesecond de-r-ondantinthefol .lowingterms s •- -J

!l3!S.Nd.451/86

Itmaybe notedthat'V'hadagreedto enterintoa-finalagreementto sell.Itappearson21. 12.••34apolicecomplainthadbeengivenby'Vag5(in5ttheseconddefendant.On29.12.84(E>:.P.2)seconddefendsintvjroteto'VinthefolloiAjing termss-- "Thishasreferencetothed i sc u ss i ony ou r.8rig.i<.'. K.Srivastavahadwiththeundersignedtoday,whereinitwasmutuallya q !'• e e d1:h a tu n 1 e s s"1 o a n "mo n e ygiventothefirmisreturneditisnotpossibletohavvetheregular"AgreementtoSell"finalised.T' h e r e f ore,wea r et e n d i n gt h ed a t etosigntheregular"AgreementtoSell"dateto31.3.1985from31.12.35asstatedinourletterof12.12.34,.ThisalsodisposesyourRegd.A/Dletterof 20,12.34."ByDecember19S4theplaintiff'Vhadpaidalltheamountsandtheremusthavebeensome-discussionabouttheinterestfree?loan.Thatiswh-Y' referenceismadebythedefendantNo.2abouttheinterestfreeloan.The?pointtobedecidedis,,whichIha'v'etorefertowhenidiscusstheoralevidence,whethertheinterestfreeloansocalledwastogotowardsthepriceoftheflatandwhetherthe .piaintiff'Vcanseektorecovertheamcjuntonthebsisisoftherelationshipofcreditoranddebtorbetween'Vandtheseconddefendant..Onthe31stof.December193-4<E>(.FW1 /3 )Brig.K . i-::; „ Sri vastavaP. W. 2wrotetotheseconddefendantonbehstlfof'Vand'3'inthe (

.

s14 s

S.No.451/86

f-oi iowifigterffiSs-

(

(

.

s14 s

S.No.451/86

f-oi iowifigterffiSs-

(

iv).TheaccoiTirriC'dationpurchasedbyMrs,ViJAYSHRIVASTAVAbeingfullyre£Hdy jthepossessionwouldbehandedovermuchbefore31Jan85,Thisextendedperiodistoenablehertogettheslectric^ilconnections.As suggestedbyyoushe is to submitthe applicationforelectricconnectionattachingacopyofthe"Agreementto SJell"dated2.2NovS4.v)RemainderaccommodationwouldbehandedovertoRearAdrfiiralR,R,S o o do rh i sa t!t h o r-i s e da 11a r n e yi , e,tomeoncompletionofthebalanceofwork j ifanybefore31Mar85,.Sinceyou alsobroughtoutthatatpresenttheresiresomedifferencesofopinionamongstthepartnersofMIRAHULEMTERF'RISE~"Sin respectofcertainPolicymattersandissueoff-'ossessionletterstothebuyers,twocopiesofthisletterareencloEjedforreturnofone-:' copydulysignedbyallthepartnersofMirahulE'nterprisesforourrecordbefore15Jan35."

Ex,P„1 is the postalreceiptandacknowledgementtcard.ThesamearemarkedasE;:,P,W„2/14in suitMo,450/S6„Ei! „P„IaI, 1/1 is thepowerofattorneygivenby'VtoP„i.\i„2,E;;«Pki2/4isthestsitementof amountsstatedtohavebeenpaidby 'Vand'S'to seconddefendantandthe statementwasfiledintheCourton 28,4,1990,Em,PW2/1dated9„1,85iscommunicationfromHindustanCommercialBankLtd.toP„W„2 aboutthreechequesissued,byP„W„2infavourofseconddefendantforthreeamountsRs.S,000/-,Rs,10j000/-andRs,10,000/™„"1-'suitWo.450/S'&E;; „P„6dated211984ISa certificategivenby the second

defendantinthE'to 1 lowingtermss-

"ThisistocertifythatR/Adm.RishiRajSoodyr,C,N„H.hasbookedthefiatnumber"3--1"measuring950,50sq„ft-inHI RAHULAPART ••••MEMTS,A-13jGreenParkExtensionNewDelhi, ItisalsocertifiedthatthisbuildingisbeingmadeaspersanctionedplanofhLC.D„videtheirletterNo.854/B/HQ/81of25.1.32<Pittestedcopyarttached)- ThisaffidavitisbeinggivenafterascertainingfullfactsonthesubjectonbehalfofallthepartnersofNIRAHULENTERPRISESandconstitutesasuretythatnoviolat.ic>nofbuildingbyelawswouldbemades--Wehavenotviolatedanybuildingbye-lav)snoranycaseisp<endingagainstusforviolationofbuildingregulations.Weholdresp'onsibi1 ityincaseofanyhindrencefromany1 o c -a1Auit h o r i t y ,''

On -ZSu 10,83(E>;,F^.7)seconddefendantwroteto'S'

inthefollowingtermsi--

"AsrequestbyMrs,V,SrivastavawehavetentativelyallottedFlatS--!toyou.AlladvancereceivedagainstFiatS--4shallbetransferredtoFlatS-1„Itisrequestedthatanearly"agreementtosell"isfinalisedagainstFlat3--1 . "

On24„iO„S3the receiptis issuedbytheseconddefendantforRs.40,000/-givenby chequeby 'S',On11,5, S3(El'Xu F'„S)seconddefG/ndantwroteto'S'sayingthat itwas notpossibleforhimtoallotany flat.The letterwrittenby'S'on 9,5,83'isdefendantforRs.40,000/-givenby chequeby 'S',On11,5, S3(El'Xu F'„S)seconddefG/ndantwroteto'S'sayingthat itwas notpossibleforhimtoallotany flat.The letterwrittenby'S'on 9,5,83'is markedasEx,P.

E;-! =P«ll.isthereceiptdated22=11=33tcrpaymentDt'Rs„10,000/-bycheque..

E>;„P„12dated13= 12»S3isreceiptforpaymentbycheque-forR5=30,000/-.E;!,.P.13isthereceiptdated10„1.S4forpaymentofRs.6,000/-bywayotcheque.

r-'=14isthereceiptdated20,1.34-forpaymentofR= =.10,000/-bywayo-fcheque, E;;,P. 15 is receiptdated25.1,34•forpaymentofRs„7,000/--byway ofcashtowardsthecostoftheflat,Ei'x.,F'.16isreceiptdated:14,6,S4forpaymentofRs,20,000/-bywayofcheque,9,'S'alsohaspaidmoneybywayofinterestfreeloan.Ex,P,17isthereceiptissuedbyseconddefendantdated7,7,34forthepaymentofRs.25,000/-incash,Ex.P.,18isthereceiptdated9,7,34forpaymentofF^s,.45,000/-as interestfreeloanbyway of cash,10.On14, 1 , 19E!5(Ex„F',lvi/13)'£3'executedthegeneralpowerof attorneyinfavourofP, (aJ . 2.Ex,PW„2/18dated12.S,S6isthe certificateissuedbyHDFC statingthatthe originalagreementforsellbetween'S'andtheseconddefendanthavebeen depositedwiththeHDFC as a securityagainsttheloanadvancedtohim.Ex.. PW,2/20 is thesame -A

statementof-amountstilsHbe-forethisCourton23 » 4 » S5 a ii"P.ldated29„ 12.1984isfromtheseconddefendantto'S'inthefollowingterms;

"ThishasreferencetothediscussionyourBrig.K.K.Srivastavishad withtheu.nde?rsignedt o d a y j, whe r e i ni twa srnu t u a 11 yagreedthatunless"loan"moneygiventothefirmisreturneditisnotpossibletohavetheregular"Aqreemen ttoSe11"finali sed.Therefore,we are extendingthe datetosigntheregular"AgreementtoSell"dateto31.311985from;31.12.S5as stsitedinourletterofL2.12«£J4„This alsodisposesyourRegd.A/Dletterof 20.12.84."

Em, p.3 is the letterdated20.12.84by'S'to theseconddefendantstatingthatasumofRs.I'/jOOO/-"waspayablebyhimtowai.rdsthecostoftheflat.E>!, P.4 is theacknowledgementcardshowingthelettersentby'S'toseconddefendant,Em. P.5 is the letterdated12.12.34fromseconddefendantto 'S'inthefollowingtermss--"Thisisto adviseyoutokindlvhavethe regular'AGREEMENT TO SELL'signedbetweenus to enableustoconfirmthe allotmentofFiatS--1measuringappro;:.955 sq.ft.inHIRAHULAPARTMENTS.Ifforanyreasonthisis not doneby31.. 12.84thenwe shalltreattheprovisionala11o tmen ta sc an eel 1ed.Kindlynote that any advancegivenfor provisionalbookingof this flatisno firm commitment onourpartfor allotingthe flatto youunlesstheregular'AGREEMENT TO SELL'issxgnedbetweenus."

*

12. Plaintiff'Vhadfiledthroughtheseconddefendant,whenhe was examined,E;:-DWl/2dated31.12„S5showingthedetailsofadvancereceivedfro.i!thepartyby theseconddefendantsThisisadocumentsummonedfromtheincomeTaxDepartment.Ex.,DWl/3,a statementof advanceason31»12.86.Ex.DWl/4thestatementofadvanceason31 „12.8?..WhyIam mentioningthisisthesearethedocumentssentforbytheplaintiff'Vandmarkedforthepurposeofplaintiff' V,,thoughthey^•^re markedon the side of thesecond.defendant.The- contentsof thesedocumentsIhaveto make it clearnow itselfcannotbe disputedby''Vor'S'„13.Plaintiff'Vclaimsthereliefofspecificperformanceagainsttheseconddefendantandalsothe6thdefendant.Accordingto'Vtheseconddefendant' hassoldaportionofthepropertyincludiblein the flatof theplaintiff'Vtothe6thdefendant.14-The caseof plaintiff'Vis thatinspiteof specificagreementon 2.11.83,^ts evidencedbyEx.PWl/2,seconddefendanthasnotbeenreadyandwillingto executethesaledeedand?^samatteroffactaportionof ithadbeensoldtothe6thdefendantand,therefore,theplaintiff"Vwasforcedtofilethissuit.Plaintiff'Vsilso claimsrecoveryof- moneyfromthe seconddetendantpaidasloantotheseconddefendant„^•Plaintiff'S'claimsthereliefofspecificperformanceand alsotherecoveryofmoneypaidasloantotheseconddefendant.The caseoftheseconddefendantisthattherewas no concludedagreementof salebet'weenthepartiesandthe interestfreeloanwasalsopaidtowardsthe priceof the flatandplaintiffcannotseekto recovertheamounts-1 havenoticedthepleaoftheseconddefendantinthewrittenstatementwhiletakingthe standthattherewasnoconciudedcontractbetweenthe plaintiffsandtheseconddefendant,the plaintiffscannotclubthe1oa nt r a ns a c t i onsvji t h t he s es u i t b .The r e f o r e ,thepleaby the seconddefendantrelatingtothe•loantransactionhas to be consideredin the lightof his specificstandthattherewasnoconcludedcontractbetweenthe plaintiffsandtheseconddefendantforthe saleof flats.Therefore,hereitselfI wantto mentionthat it is notopentotheplaintiffsto say thatthereis anadmissionbythe seconddefendantin the writtenstatementabouttheloan transactionIfIcometotheconclusionthattherehasbeenaconcludedcontractbetweenthe plaintiffsandtheseconddefendant-itbecomesnecessaryforme to considerLhe^ put- pose or the demand of money as loan bythe J

J

piainti-ftBto the seconddefendant.Thertv.theshortpointthatwouldarisetor considerationinthesetwoc a--5es is whethertherewasaconcludedcontractbetweenthe partiesforthe saleoftheflatsor the entiremoneypaidby theplaintiffstotheseconddefendanttowardssaleconsideration.documentE:;!uDPW=ldated2.11.S.:;.,whichIhadalreadyreferredto,assumesimportanceforthepurposeofdecidingthequestionand the same has to be consideredinthelightofthe-? documentsi- summoned by theplaintiff'VfromtheIncomeTa>! Departmentwithreferencetotherecordsof the seconddefendantandthefirstdefendantwiththeIncomeTaxDepartmentsOneaspectI wantto noticehc-?reisthattheplaintiffsfiledapplicationsforinjunctio'iialsoformandatoh/ii ij ui ic Lioridirectingtheseconddefendanttoputtheminpossessionofthe flats.This Courtpassedanorderon 21.3,1937directingtheseconddefendanttoput the plaintiffsin possessionof theflatsandtheplaintiffsare inpossessionoftheseflatsnow.The orderpassedby thisCourtwasconfirmedbytheSupremeCourt.17„FollowingissueswereframedinthetwosuitsISSUES(SuitNo.451/86)

S.No.451/36

3 p Bc i T i c.pG r -fDilla n c eb e i n qgrtanted,anyamountoverand£tbovetheadmittedamountofRs=2,64,261/-,then 5whethertheplaintiff,is entitledtoc I a i ma d .1u b t me n tf o rt fi sec B B sc 1 a i ma q a i n s -t.t h baliegedloanamount?9„Whetherthe salsorpartingwithpossessionbydefendants1--5ofonebedroomoftheflatinquestioninf^^vourofdefendantMo.6isfraudulent,,illegalandnotbindingontheplauintiffforthereasonsstatedinparas24(a)to24<i)oftheplaint?OPP10.Relief,OPPISSUES(SuitMo,450/36)

9„

1„hlhethertheplainthasbeensignedandverifiedbyapersoncompetenttordo soandsuitinstitutedbyaduly-authorisedperson?GPP.2.Whethertheagreementdated2» 11 =1933,e>;ec:utedbetweentheplaintiffandthedefendants1-5andsetupbytheplaintiff,isbindingina 11r e s p e cso nt i"iep a i'"t i e s-?OPP3.IfIssueMo.2isheldinfavourofthe•plaintiff,whetherdefendants1-5arenotliia-bietoB>:ecutethesaledeedandtransferpossessionofthefiatmeasuringS'SSsq,ft,totheplaintiff?OPDs1--54.Whetherthe 'plaintiffisliabletopayto defendants1-5anysumoverandabovetheadmittedsum ofRs.2568,000/-inexecutionofagreementtose 1 1OPDs1 —51,Whethertheplaintiffwasr e a d ya n dwi 11 i rigt op e r f o r mhispartoftheagreementat r P„54.AccordingtoF„t\Llbyletterdat(3d.1.2« 12.34u P „ 6 .iseconddefendantcance?! ledtheallotmentsAbouttakingpossessionofthefiatS-2,pursuanttotheorde^rsoftheSupremeCourt,P,= k!.lwouldstate"intheplanE;;.P.9flatS'-2isshownwhichissupposedtobe threebedrooms,,threebathroomsandtwo storesbutMr.Kishoregaveusonebatliroom,,onebedroomandonestoreroomless.Accordingtoher,thethirdbedroomiswiththe6thdefendant,.AboutE;:„DPW.,1in'thecross--exaiTiinationP.W.Ivjouldstate"theagrec-'menttosellE):„PWl/2hasfivepages..DPW.lis signedbymeonpages1,2,3.4and5.\Thewitnesswishestovolunteerastatementinadditiontowhathasbeensaid.Itissodetailedinthevolunteeredstatement.

NotesThatIam goingtoaskhertorepeatso that itistakenverbatimonrecord).

Idonotrecollectfully,butIrememberin1983 aftersigningailthepagesoftheagreementtosellwhe?nS.B.K'i shoreinsistedonwitnessingmyhusbandandR.R.Sood.Myhusbandnoticedthathehasputsomemoney.Idonotknowsomeamountofmoneythatwehavetopaya -f-1e rp o s s e s s i ono ft h ef 1a t,b u tmyhusbandstartedarguing,saying,I.havepaideveryamount.Hesaidthisis notmeantforyou,a.ndthis;ismeantforthepeopiev-jhowi 11bookfiatafteryou.So aftertheargument,he changedtheagreementtoselllastpage.He wentinsideA1.3 ,(3!•- e e nP a y-!E x t e n s i o n ,a ri dt ii e nhechangedthelastpage,andthat :265S.Mq.. 451/36

i.wh yt i"ii sc h a.n g ei st h e r e .Q,.Pleasestateinwhosehandwritingistheportionencircledinredandmarked'A'onpage5ofE:-!.AsTheportionmarked'A'isinthehandofmyhusband,butportionmarked'B'isnotinthehandwritingofmyhusband.Portionmarked'Cisnotinthehandwritingofmyhusband.Icannot. saywhoseh a r'id wr i. t i n qi ^5t h i s.G,Iput ittoyouthatIsignedatportionmarked'B'toattesttheportionmarked'A'onpage5ofE;-; .D.P„1 »Whathaveyouto say?Ans.Ihadnotseenmyhusbandwritingthetextpartofportionmarked'A'.Irecognisethehandwritingofmyhusband.

IandmyhusbandwenttoNotarypublicv-gheremy signaturesandthesignaturesofS«B„Kishoreor ofmyhusbandatpage5wereattestedbyNotaryPublic»TheNotaryPublicwasatSreenPark.Itisincorrectto suggestthatwhatwas writteninhandbymyhusbandwasforHDF-Cloan,.Ido notrecollecttakinganaffidavitfromMr.Kishoredated21.3.34.E;-:hibitPUi2istheletterwrittenbyme tod 6?fend antNo.1.It is correctthatthepresentsuitwasfiledin19S6,."

Shewouldsaythatshewasnotabletorecollectthatwhethertherewasany suitinthesubordinatecourtin19S5.Shev.!asnotableto'saywhethershefiledsuitNo,.165/85inthesubordinatecourtforinjunction.Again,aboutEx.DPiAi.lthequestionsandanswersareinthefollowingtermsinherevidencedated24.3=94s-"Q.Accordingto the 5thpageof r*-- !27!S.M0.451/3&

E>! =D, F-'Wl ,whatisthetotalvalueo-ftheflat?

Ans„Accordingtothe5thpageo-fE>!.D,PW1,theamountpayablebyuswas=2,64,261/-plusFi:s.171712/-.

(VoiuntBered-theseamountsVMsrenotagreedtobepaidbyus)Q„PleasereadthefirstparagraphofEx.D.PWlatpage5,Ans»The firstparagraphatpage5readsas:-''Thisagreementisprovisionalandapropersaledeedwillbemadeaftertheflatwillbeready«andisdrawnupforthepurchaserto getaloanfromHDF-Candshallbetreatedascancel-led,atthetimeofissueofpossessionletterbythebuilderswhenafresh-agreementwillbeenteredintobetweenthesellerandthepurchaser„

Q„F-'leasestatewhetherwhatistobefoundatpage5ofE>;.D.PW1isaphotocop-y'of"original"?Ans.Idonotknow™GLYoudidnotfilepage5oftheagreementintheactionfiledforspecificperformance.Whatisyourreason?Ans„IdidnotfileitbecauseIdidnotha.'vethatpage.(3.1 suggestitto-/outhat-youdidnotfilepage5becausetheoriginalwaswithme.Idetainedit.Whathaveyoutosay?Ans.Wo.(3.IsuggestittoyouthatthevalueofthefiatNo.43 j 970/--.YougaveanearnestmoneyofF\'s.,2,37,000/--,andthebalanceduewasRs.1,98,000/--,Wha'thave-/du-hosa-y?

Ans.Ido notthinkwehavetopaya r-i y t h i n gt o11-)&•d e -fg n d a n t.C-!»IsuggestittoyouthatyouhavegivenRs„1,455000/-asadvancetoMirahulEnterprises,Ans.Igavealoano-fRs.Ij45,000/--to defendantNo»2jnotdefenda.ntNo=i.OutofthereceiptswhichtotalRb„1,45^000/-,,paidtayme,only[£;•••;«P,53andE;-!.P,54aresignedbyS„B.KishoreforRs„30,000/-,TheotherreceiptswhichareforRb„1 1,15,000/-aresignedbyRahulKishoreaspartnero -fMi. r a h u 1E n t. e?r p r i s e s „

Itisincorrectto suggestthatdefendantNo,,2triedtoreturntheloanofRs,1,45,000/-tome,Q,On12,12,1934,Iaskedyoutocomeandsignagreementfor954sq,ft,.Youwrotethatyouarepreparedtosignregularagreement.Doyouhavetheagreementof954 sq,ft,,thefiatinwhichyouarelivingtoday?

ilThewitnessrequestsforseeingthedocument,3tNote!Thisanswerisp)romp tedbyinterjectionof"Mr.B,Mohan,c o u n s e 1-fo rt h ep 1 a i n t i f f11 „

Ans,Ihavegotagreementof1156sq,ft,,Gi.,DidI(S,B.Kishore)everaskyouforloan?

Ans,Yes,

Q.Doyouhaveanyletterwrittenbyme,askingforloan?Ans,My husbandmightbehavingit.(Ji,Whyhaveyoushov',ininthes p e c i f i cp G?r•f or ma n c ea p p 1 i.c a t i o nthatyouwantinterestat15Xwhent hei-e c e i p ts ho wsv e r yc 1e a r 1y•''interestfreeloan",andthereis :295S.No.451/86

notimelimitto give itback.

Ans=Pleaseaskthisquestion-frommyhusband 5becauseIhenotattendedthecourtforthelast10years.ThisisfirsttimeIhaveattendedthecourt.(2.Whyhaveyouclubbedtheprayerforreturno-ftheloanwiththespecificperformancesuitjas ithasnothingtodowiththespecificperformance?

Ans„Idonotknow."

Therefore,theseconddefendantelicitedfromthiswitnessthatRs.15 45,000/-whichwasreceivedas'loan'wasonlytowardsthepriceofthefiat.20.Efrig.Srivasta'ivajhusbandof'Vandattorneyof'S',wasexaminedasP.W.Zandtheexaminationcommencedon22.3.96.HewouldstatethatthetotalcostagreedwasRs,2,64,263/-.AboutEx.D.PWldated2!. 11.S3P.W.2wouldgiveusaversioninthefollowingtermss~

, "Q„22.F'leaseseethedocumentEx.DPWi-.Whatisthisdocumentabout?Ans^.Thisdocumentwasthefirstagreementwhichwasgiventomy wifeforsignatures,vjhichwasbroughtdulysignedbydefendantNo.2.Aftershehadsignedit,itwasgiventomeforwitnessingandIhadwitnessed• it.Atthatstage,Adm.Soodwassigninghisdocumentsandhe alsogcuveittomeforwitnessing.Iwitnessedthatagreementalso.ThendefendantNo.2toldAdm.Soodto signsomecorrections.Therefore,IstartedreadingthisdocumentEx.DPWlandonthe1stpage1found V

; -315

HighCourtandnotarisedinthe.HighCourt.Ex„DPW»lwas not acteduponby the partiesanditwasnotnotarisedinhispresenceandth.isdocumentwas notbyconsentof partiesandcopyof thisdocumentwas not givento him.When askedwhetherthe seconddefendstntgaves copytof-'.W=y-5P.W-2wouldstates "Q„27»WhatdiddefendantMo.2 tellyou aboutthisdocument?Ans.Whenthenewagreementswere• beingtypedin the High Court,defendant' No,,2destroyedcertaindocufnentswhichincludedsomestamppaperalso.1hadno disbelieveorlossof faiththatdefendantNo.2didnotdestroythesed o c u rne n t sa tt: h a ttime.1ailthetimetrustedhimandkeptonpayingmoneyingoodfaith."

P.W.2expectsustobelievethattheseconddefendantpromisedto destroythisdocumentandbeacceptedthat statement.He wouldfurtherstates'•'Q.2S.DidhetellyouthatdefendantNo.2willdestroythedocumentE;:„DPW.t?

Ans.Yeson5.11.S3whenthed o c u f'lie n t swerebe i n grio t a r i s e dhe reaffirmedthatalltheolddocumentshavebeendestroyedandp 1easeberestassui red .i n c 1 u d i n gE >i. DPW1 .d o c u f'lie n t swerebe i n grio t a r i s e dhe reaffirmedthatalltheolddocumentshavebeendestroyedandp 1easeberestassui red .i n c 1 u d i n gE >i. DPW1 .

Q,29.Whydidyounotkeepacopyofthisdocument?ofthisdocument?Ans.As1 saidearlier,wehadnoopportunityforanydistrustandwehadgoodfaithonde f end an ti'-io .2 .opportunityforanydistrustandwehadgoodfaithonde f end an ti'-io .2 .

SeconddefisndanthasexaminedhimselfasD„W„J.andhe wouldspeakto thefactthattherewasanagree/rsenton 2. 12. S3 andtheagreementisonlyprovisiDnaiandtheplaintiffsarenotentitledtotherelief.Hewouldstate"In1937when the matterwas inDB-1 and witha such strongorderbehindhimImadetwopay ordersforthetotalvalueof theloanto be givenbackbut,theynevertookit„Theirprayerwastheywantedtheirloanbackwithinterestandswallowmy flatsat-60%ofthe totalvalue,"Hespeaksabouttheorderpassedby thisCourton21„S„S7andtheappealtherefrom.Hisevidenceisthattherevsiasnoconcludedcontractand iftheplaintiffscanq.ivebackthe flatstohimhe cangive'backthe-moneybacktothem..Therefore,,thereisnoadmissionbytheseconddefendantthattherewereloantransactions=22.Thusjwehaveto seeon the evidenceofP.W„2 and the evidence of D.UJ.l (second defendant)tocometoa decisionon the questionof concludedcontractandthetotalconsideration„23„Alookat E>:,PWl/2andE;-;„DF:'W1andacloseexaminationofthesedocumentsvjouldrevest 1therealfacts.The stamppaperswerepurchasedbyV"on 4. 10. S3.The stamppaperfor-R-s.5/--forE;;.F-W1/25thenumberis givenas 2S422.ThestampforRs.5/--forE>:. DPWl the numberis given

as28421 „ThestamppapertorFis „5/forE>!,,PW2/21agreementbetv-'^een'S'andseconddefendantbearsthenumber2S41Sdated4»10„S3,.Allthestamppropersv-^erepurchasedfromstampvendorSmt.F'remKumari,LicenceNo.157,PatialaHouseCourts jNew Delhi.InE;-!=PWl/2andE>:,DPW.lfirstfourpagesareidentical»F'ageNo » 5 inE>;. F-'IaI« 1/2readsas-i-ollowss- "INWITNESSETHWHEF<EftSo-fthepartiesafore/mentionedhavesettheirrespectivehandsonthisAgreementandhavesignedthesameontheday'smonthandtheyearaswrittenabove,"In thispagesecond-defendanthas signedonbehalfofthefirstdefendant,plaintiff'Vhassignedaspurchaser^F'.W.2andplaintiff'Vhavesignedaswitnesses.E;-(.PWl/2is attestedbytheNotaryPublicNr..B.C.Vermaon5„11.S3.E>;,.DP!a!1isalsoattestedbyMr,G„C.Vermaonthesamedatei.e.5.11.83.Inallthefivepagesinboththedocuments.Nr.G,C.Vermahasputhisseal.E;-:,PW.2/21is signedbytheNotaryF-'ublic,whosenameIam notableto decipherfromthedocument.Itwasnotarisedon2.11.83andl-"'„W.2haswitnessedthedocument.Therefore,thetheorybyF-'.W.landF'„ W„2that,theywerenotpresent,atthetimeE;:-;..DPi.'J. 1 was attestedbytheNotaryF-'ublic : •:-.4 sS.No.451/S6

andtheyarenotawareo-f- the: 5thpageinE>!„DPW.tcannotat ailbe accepted.Forreasonsbestknowntothem,thepartieshadnotplacedthefull-Factsastohowthesetwodocumentshadcocfieintoe::;istenc(?..i tmay alsobenoticedthat'P.W„2deniedhis signaturesinEx.DPW.l.Eiuton4,3,37headmittedthesignaturesbeforethisCourtandthisCourtpassedthefoilowingorder "Learnedcounselfortheplaintiffstatesthat itwasby mistakethathehaddeniedthedocumentinquestionbutinfactit isadmittedthatit is signedby theplaintiffandalsothatthewritingonthelastpageoftheagreementproducedbythedefendantbearsthewriting•inthehandofEfrig.i<J<„Srivastava,"

TheevideitusofP,,W,, 1 andP,W,2inthisre;;^;pectdirectstheneedleofsuspiciontowardsthemandtheyaretryingtobe toosmartandtheydonothesitateinindulginginfalsehood.AccordingtoP,W.2the; totalconsiderationis Rs,5?,64,261/•••••.Andas on2„;j. 1,8;3Rs„1 , i 7,, 000/--hadbeenpaidandtheb£ilancealsohavebeenpaidexcepttotheextentof Rs,l,26i/--,ifthatis so,P.W.2isnot ableto giveany explanationas tohow didtheseconddefendantgiveastatementtotheIncomeTaxDepartmentthathehadreceivedt'Staladvanceof Rs,5^30,000/--fromplaintiff'V.Ifwetakeliitnaccountthepaymentsmadebyplaintiff'V'' includingRs,1,45,000/-,whichis statedtobe'loan'thatwouldnotcometoRb.5,80,000/".Thereisabalanceo-f-nearly-Rs„1 , 72,000/-.11 isnotthecaseoff- „ W» 2thatthestatementgivenbytheseconddefendnattotheIncomeTa>;Departmentis notcorrect.It Is a'lsonotthecaseofP.W.2thathepaidextraRs»1 H'721,000/--overandaboveRs.4,08,000/-(includingtheloanamount)totheseconddefendanttowardsthecostofthe?flat.Therefore,bysomearrangementwhichasIhadmentionedearlier,bothpair tieshadcometosomeunderstandingforpayingtheconsideration^^ndtheyarenotprepairedtotel 1 us astohowtheplaintiff'VhadpaidRs-5,30,000/-.Therefore,thecaseoftheseconddefendaintthattherewasnoloantransactionatallandtheallegedloantransactiononlyanomenclature^idoptedbythepartiesfortheirownconvenienceandtheplaintiff'Vcannotclaimanyamountandseektorecoverthesamefromtheseconddefendantistruei/ariiJ I haveno he-jsitationinacceptingthesame.24.Onthequestionofconcludedcontractbetweentheparties,Ihavenohesitationinaccept in C;i.hecaseoftheplau.ntiff'V'thatseconddefendanthadagreedto sellthefiatandplaintiff'Vhasalwaysbeenreadyandwillingtoperformherpartofthecontract.25-InsuitNo.451/86thereisonemoreaspecti.e.withreferencetotheclaimof 'r'f 536:S.No.451/86

specific relief against the 6th defendant.Th^6thdefendanth^-lSnotchosentocontestandvjassete>;parte»Fromthedocumentsfiledinthecase,j;findno difficultyincomingtotheconclusionthatthe6thdefendantis onlyan aliasor altarego oftheseconddefendant=Therefore,theseconddefendanthadnotdeliveredpossessionofthecompleteareaagreedtobyhimtotheplaintiff'V'.,26„Withreferenceto suitNo.450/E36,Nr.Soodhasnotenteredthewitnessbo>:andP.W.2asattorneysoughtto giveevidenceonhisbehalfalso.P.W.2speaksaboutthetransactionbetween'S'andtheseconddefendant.

Gi.60„Pleaseseethedocumentsatpages14 to16ofdocumentsfiledin suit450/36,bythep 1 a i n t i f fa n dtellu sa b o u twhattheyareabout?pages14 to16ofdocumentsfiledin suit450/36,bythep 1 a i n t i f fa n dtellu sa b o u twhattheyareabout?

An s.E. P W2 /15,2 /16a r eh o u s et ar e c e i p t s .E. P W. 2 /17i st h esanctionorderissuedbytheMCD.r e c e i p t s .E. P W. 2 /17i st h esanctionorderissuedbytheMCD.

G!.61.F' 1 e £1s E?s e et h ed o c u me n ta tpage17,vjhatis thisabout?page17,vjhatis thisabout?An s „E ;•! „ Pw2/13i st. hecert i f i c a teissuedbyHL>f-"C thatoriginalagreementto saleis depositedwithHDFCfortheloana d v a needtoA d m i r a 1£5o o dissuedbyHL>f-"C thatoriginalagreementto saleis depositedwithHDFCfortheloana d v a needtoA d m i r a 1£5o o d Q.62.PleaseseepageIS,whatisthisdocumentaboutcindwhohassignedit?thisdocumentaboutcindwhohassignedit?Ans „e:.PW. 2/19is theagreementtosellsignedbydefendantMo.2as sellerandAdmiraltosellsignedbydefendantMo.2as sellerandAdmiral -4^

V-

:3S;S.Nd.451/86

defendant2fordefendant1andAdiTiSood.Itbearsmysignatureaswitnessandwasnotarisedinmypresence.,"

P„W.2doesnot- speakaboutE;;..andF„1S.,whicharestatedtobe receiptsissuedbytheseconddefendantforthepaymentofcashmadebyplaintiff'S'.Thesetwopaymentsweremadebyplaintiff'S'totheseconddefendantsIt isnotthecaseofP„W.2thathewaspresent,whenthefcaseofplaintiff'Vabouttheloancannotbeaccepted,thecaseofplaintiff'S'relatingto'loan'wouldautomaticallyfalltothegroundbecausethenatureofthetransactionsbetweenplaintiff'V,plaintiffandtheseconddefendantwerethesame.BecausemisunderstandinghadarisenbetweenthepartiestheyhadchosentoputforthB>!tremecontentions'withaviewtodefeatingtherightsoftheotherparty..Therefore,thecaseof plaintiff'S'thatRs.70,000/-waspaidfortobe returriedbytheseconddefendantcannotat allbe accepted,.ThoughP.i;^„2purportedto representtheplaintiff'S',aspowerofattorneyholder,onthisaspectofthecaseevidenceof plaintiff'S'is veryessential.Won-examinationof'S'is verycrucialand it is wellsettledthatthepartiesmustplaceallevidencebeforethe Courtandtheycannotkeepthemselvesoutof the witnessboxleavingthe Courttoguess aboutfacts,,Theref-ore,Ihavenohes-itationtodrawadverseinferenceagainstjj lain tiff'S'r e i a t i n g1:cjt h et r a n s a c:t". i o no -F' i o a n 'o fRs .'7O5OOO/-totheseconddefendant.Therefore,thecaseof plaintiffs'Vand'S'onthequestionof'loan'hastoberejected.Eveninthe• st^-itementfiledbeforethisCourtby plaintiffs'Vand'S'dated2S.4.955theamountsmentionedbyseconddefendantbeforetheIncomeTaxDep-irt/nentarereferredto.Therefore,onthebasisoftheorale v i d en c eo fF'. W. 1 ,P. W. 2a n dD1W1an dt i"iedocuiTientaryevidenceincludingthe'documents3uiTifriDnc-?dfromtheIncomeTa;-;De'partrrientbytheplaintiff'V,the conclusionis irresistiblethattherewasaconcludedcontractbetweenplaintiff'V'andseconddefendantandplaintiff'S'andtheseci.JMudefendantandalltheamountspaidbyplaintiffs'Vand'S'vjouldgotothecostoftheflats.Whethertheamountsgivenby plaintiff'S'ismentionedbytheseconddefendantbeforetheIncomeTa;-;DepartmentistherebeforeCourtornot,thepatternbeingthesameasthatofplaintiff' V'theinferenceisthatplaintiff'S'paidRs. • 70 5000/-intheformof'lo^-.n'towardsthecostoftheflat.27.ThelearnedseniorcounselMr,GhoshsubmittedthatthecaseoftheplaintiffsmustbeSicceptedinto toandtheseconddefendant i •

appearingin personsubmittedthattheplaintiffsdidnot have any finalagreementand,therefore,Lheirclaimforspecificperformancemustberejectedandtheyare not entitledto thereturnof themoneyalso.28..HavingregardtothefactsandcircumstancesjwhichI had analysedabove,itisclearthattherewas a concludedcontractfortheCsale of flatsbetweenplaintiff'Vand the seconddefendantandplaintiff'S'andtheseconddefendant.

shallnow takeup the issuesandgivemyfindings.suitMo.451/S6on issueWd=1Ifindthat the plainthas been signedand verifiedbyacompetentperson..i heissue?isansweredaccordingly °.OriissueWo„2! I findthattherewasaconcludedagreementon 2.11.1983betweenplaintiffanddefendants1 to 5.Theissueisansweredaccordingly.

On issueMo. 3 I findthatthe defendantsare liableto executethe sale deed.The issue isansweredaccordingly.Of"' issueNo.5 1 findthattheplaintiffhasalwaysbeenreadyand willingto performherpartofthecontract.TheissueisansvKsred•

f

541 5S.No.451/86

accordingly.

Conclusion

34. Oni'SBueNo,6I-findthatascontendedbydefendants.1to5therewasanagreementeXec:utedon2 =J, J. . 1983 ^whic I'iismarkedasE;:„DPW.ljand thatis alsobindingon- thep-arties,35.On IssueNos.4,7 and8,Ifindthattheplaintiffis not entitledto recoveranyaniountandthe pla^intiffiS' alsonot. obligedto payanyamount' overandabovetheamountspaidtothedefendantsNo,ito5,Theseissuesareaccordinglyanswered.36,OnissueNo,9Ifindthat6thdefendantisboundto conveyto the plaintiffalongwithdefendants1 to5 thethirdbedroom,whichformedpartof theagreementbetweenthe parties.37,In suitNo,450/86on issueNo,1 ..Ifindthatthe plainthasbeensignedand verifiedbyacompetentperson.Thisissueisansweredaccordingly.3S„OnissueNo,2Ifindthattherewasaconcludedcontracton2.11,33.ThisissueisVa n s we r e da c c o r d i!'i g 1 y „39,Onissues3and5,Ifindthattheplaintiffhasalwaysbeenreadyandwillingtoperformhispartofthecontractandthedefendants1to5areboundto executethesaledeedinfavourofthe plaintiff.Ithasalready,beenfoundthatpossessionhas alreadybeenhanded )y •mS.No.451/86

overtotheplaintiff.The^seissuesaredecidedaccording iy.

40 „Issue?No.6doesnotariseforconsiderationinthiscase.41.On issuesMo-4,7andSIfindthattheplaintiffhasgiventhefullconsiderationtothedefendants1 to 5 and defendantsare notobligedtopayanyamounttothe plaintiff.Theseissues a r ea n s we r ssj,a c c o r d i n g 1y.42.Consequently,in suitNo.451/S6,thereshallbeadecrees

(i) directingdefendants1 to6toe::-!ecuteasaledeedinfavouroftheplaintiff'VwithreferencetoflatNo.S-2|,C-}reen ParkExtension,Mew.Delhiwithineightweeksfromtodayandintheeventofdefendantsfailingtoe;-:ecutethesaledeedwithinthetimestipulated,anofficerofthisCourtshallexecutethesaledeedinfavouroftheplaintiffinaccordancewithlaw;

(ii) dismissingtheclaimoftheplaintifffortherecc-veryofRs.1,45,000/-?

(iii) directingthedefendants1 to6toputthC" plaintiffinpossessionofthethirdbedroominS--2,,GreenParkExtension,New Delhi?

\'iv)directingthepartiestobeart h e i rov^nc o s t s .

In suitKk:).450/fcJ6thereshallbe;adecrees(i)directingdefendants1 to5toexecuteasaledeedinfavourofthe plaintiff'S'withreferencetof 1a t-o.S-1 ,6 r e e nPa r kEix t e?n s i o n, r.

.J-

543s

Ne'IaiDelhiwithineightweeksfromtodayandintheeventof defendantsfailingto executethesaledeedwithinthetimestipulated,,anofficerof thisCourtshallexecutethesaledeedinfavourofth(?plaintiffin accordancewithlawn<ii)dismissingtheclaimoftheplaintifffortherecoveryofF?s.•70,000/--.(iii)directingthepartiestobeartheirowncosts.

J u.1 y1^96,' g'' g'

i<,AMANOORTHY