Gujarat High Court

SCA/2298/1984 of TALAJA TALUKA CO-OP PURCHASE &SALES UNION LTD Vs GUJARAT STATE on 5 December 2000

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2298 of 1984 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2298 of 1984

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI

and

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH

============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO

-------------------------------------------------------------- TALAJA TALUKA CO-OP PURCHASE &SALES UNION LTD

Versus

GUJARAT STATE

-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR KG VAKHARIA for Petitioners MR LR PUJARI, AGP, for Respondent No. 1

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI

and

MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH

Date of decision: 05/12/2000

ORAL JUDGEMENT

(Per : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI)

In this petition the petitioners have in paragraph no.7 contended that the provisions of Section 80(2) of the Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act, 1961, are arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 19 of the Constitution and on that basis apprehending that the Government may appoint Nominees under the said provision, as stated in paragraph no.3 of the petition, have prayed for a direction on the respondents not to appoint such Nominees. The constitutional validity of the provisions of Section 80(2) of the said Act has been upheld by a Division Bench of this Court in AMRELI DISTRICT COOPERATIVE SALE & PURCHASE UNION V. STATE OF GUJARAT reported in 25 (2) GLR at page 1244. The challenge against the said provision is wholly misconceived. The petition is therefore rejected. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Ad interim relief stands vacated.

���*** (mohd)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead