Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/44555/2014 of NAVPREET KAUR AND ANR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS on 31 December 2014

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-44555-2014 Date of Decision: December 31, 2014 Navpreet Kaur and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURMIT RAM Present: Mr. Kapil Khanna, Advocate, for the petitioners. *****

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Navpreet Kaur and another

CRM-M-44555-2014Date of Decision: December 31, 2014

Versus

_.. Petitioners

State of Punjab and others

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURMIT RAM

.....Respondents

Present:Mr. Kapil Khanna, Advocate,

for the petitioners.

KKK K

GURMIT RAM, J. (Oral)

Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is forissuance of a direction to the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of thepetitioners and not to harass them at the instance of respondent Nos.4 and 5.

The petitioners have got married against the wishes of their parents. Theyare stated to be major. In support of her proof of age petitioner No.! has placed onrecord a copy of matriculation examination certificate (Annexure P-1) wherein her dateof birth is mentioned as 20.12.1995, whereas petitioner No.2 has also placed on record acopy of his affidavit (Annexure P-2) depicting his date of birth as 09.08.1990. Theyhave also moved a representation before the Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar(Annexure P-4) for protection of their life and liberty.

Without adverting to the merits of the controversy, the present petition isdisposed of with a direction to respondent No.2, the Commissioner of Police, Jalandharto take appropriate action on the said representation.

This order has nothing to do with regard to validity or invalidity of themarriage of the petitioners.

| GURMIT RAM JJUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead