Patna High Court
CIVIL APPEAL 16957 of 2013 on 1 January 1986
5
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16957 of 2013
======================================================
Dr. Brahm Deo Sinha Son of Late Ram Saran Mahto Resident Of MohallaKisan Nagar, Anishabad, P.O.- Phulwarisarif Town, P.O.- Phulwarisarif,District- Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.The State of Bihar.
2.The Principal Secretary, Animal Husbandry Department, Government OfBihar, New Secretariat, Baily Road, Patna.Bihar, New Secretariat, Baily Road, Patna.
3.The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government Of Bihar, OldSecretariat, Patna. Secretariat, Patna.
4.The Accountant General, Bihar, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================Appearance :For the Petitioner: NoneFor the State : Mr. Kamil Akhtar, AC to AAG-5For the Accountant General: Mr. Ram Kinker Choubey, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
ORAL ORDER
14-10-2025
No one appears for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondents are present.
Page 1 of 2
2. The petitioner has filed the instant application forthe following relief(s) :- “1.(i) To set a side the order dated 12.04.2012contained in Memo No.1137 whereby and whereunder the claim of the petitioner has been rejected.(ii) To compute and pay the entire retrial benefittaking into account of revision of pay from payscale of Rs.1575-2300 to Rs.3700-5000/- witheffect from 01.01.1986 as was done in the case ofthe counter parts of the petitioner andconsequently pension of the petitioner be revisedand fixed with effect from 01.03.1987.
(ii) Arrear of salary from 01.01.1986 to28.02.1987 and balance amount of pension, Shiv/- U
Gratuity and Leave Salary.
(iii) Benefit of revision of Pension on account of5[th] Pay Revision Commission with effect from01.01.1996 in terms of Resolution No.660 dated08.02.1999 of the Finance Department to theGovernment of Bihar.
(iv) Balance amount of pension consequent torevision of pension on account of 6[th] Pay Revision01.01.2006 in terms of Resolution No.27/137/08dated 23.09.2009.”
3. No one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 25.8.2025 also when the Court was pleased to record the following order :- “No one appears on behalf of thepetitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent-State is present.
2. This is an old mater of the year 2013and still the petitioner is not showing interest inappearing and pressing the writ application.
3. One last indulgence is being grantedto the petitioner, flailing which on the next, date,the Court may consider dismissing the writapplication on merits.4. Put up this case on 22.09.2025.”
4. As no one appears on behalf of the petitioner, thecase is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Partha Sarthy, J)
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…