Tripura High Court
WP(C)/819/2018 of KANTI LASKAR Vs NERAMAC AND 3 ORS on 20 December 2018
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA W.P.(C) No.819 of 2018 Kanti Laskar ----Petitioner(s) Versus NERAMAC and 3 Ors. ----Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. T. D. Majumder, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. B. Majumder, Adv. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA Order 20/12/2018 Mr. T. D. Majumder,
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
W.P.(C) No.819 of 2018
Kanti Laskar
Versus
----Petitioner(s)
NERAMAC and 3 Ors.
----Respondent(s)For Petitioner(s) : Mr. T. D. Majumder, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. B. Majumder, Adv.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA Order
20/12/2018
Mr. T. D. Majumder, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that in terms of the Rule 154 (b) of the Central Administrative Tribunal Rules of Practice, 1993 the Appendix-IV has been modified. It appears that in the Appendix-IV, the name of the North East Regional Agricultural Marketing Corporation Limited (NERAMAC) have been included as the one of the organization which is included for purpose of Rule-14 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. In view of the provisions of Section-14 read with Section-28 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, this court does not has any jurisdiction to entertain this petition in terms of the decision of the apex court in L. Chandrakumar vs. Union of India and Others reported in1997 (2) SCR 1186.
Having confronted with this situation Mr. T. D. Majumder, learned counsel has submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal at Guwahati within a month from today.
Prayer stands allowed.
This writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal within a period of one month from today.
Mr. B. Majumder, learned counsel appears for the respondents.
JUDGE
Moumita
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…