Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/50111/2017 of JYOTI AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 29 December 2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.107 CRM-M-50111-2017 Date of decision : 29.12.2017 Jyoti and another ..... Petitioners VERSUS State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL Present: Mr. Harpreet Singh Rakhra,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CRM-M-50111-2017 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
Sr. No.107
CRM-M-50111-2017 |Date of decision : 29.12.2017—__ Petitioners Jyoti and another VERSUS.
State of Punjab and others..... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL
Present: |Mr. Harpreet Singh Rakhra, Advocate for the petitioners. ©
FE FE
SUDHIR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
The present petition has been filed seeking protection of lifeand liberty as the petitioners fear that respondents No.5 to 8 (parents andother relations of petitioner No.1) will cause them bodily harm as theirmarriage has been performed against their wishes.
Petitioners No. 1 and 2 are major and the same is proved bytheir Aadhar Cards (Annexures P-1 and P-2).
In view of above, | deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2 to ensure that life and liberty of the petitioners be protected by providingthem adequate protection. The representation (Annexure P-5) already madeas well as the facts mentioned in this petition shall be kept in mind by him.
The petition is accordingly disposed of.
(SUDHIR MITTAL)
JUDGE.December 29, 2017
Ramandeep Singh _
Whether speaking / reasonedYes/NoWhether ReportableYes/ No