Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/12306/2022 of RAJA AND ANR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 30 December 2022

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-12306-2022 Date of decision : 30.12.2022 Raja and another .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ *** Present :- Mr. Harpal Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners. ***

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

115IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA.AT CHANDIGARH

CRWP-12306-2022Date of decision : 30.12.2022

Raja and another

Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and otherswee REeSpondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICERAJESH BHARDWAJ222222

Present :-Mr. Harpal Singh Sidhu, Advocate,for the petitioners.222for the petitioners.222

RAJESH BHARDWAJ_J. (Oral)

Present petition has been filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India for directing respondents no.1 to 3 to protect the lifeand liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent no.4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both thepetitioners are living in live-in-relationship against the wishes ofrespondent no.4 and have sought protection to their life and liberty. Hehas submitted that although the petitioner No.2 is 17 years of age yet sheis entitled for protection. Both the petitioners apprehend danger tromrespondent no.4. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated24.12.2022 (Annexure P-3) to respondent no.2.

Notice of motion to respondents no.1| to 3-State only.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Vishnav Gandhi, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the State.

Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with adirection to respondent no.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Tarn Taranto decide the representation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioners and grant CRWP-12306-2022

them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It isclarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to thepetitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed bythem. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinionwhatsoever by this Court on the validity of the live-in-relationship of thepetitioners. —

Disposed of|

30.12.2022m. sharma

( RAJESH BHARDWAJ )JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned|Yes/NoWhether reportableYes/No

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead