Delhi High Court
LA.APP./794/2006 of UOI Vs MADAN MOHAN & ANR on 7 December 2006
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December, 2006 + LA.APP. 793/2006 # U.O.I Appellant ! Through :Mr. S.S. Gulia, Advocate. versus $ JITENDER KUMAR &ANR Respondent A Through ;Mr, Sanjay Poddar, Advocate. AND +,/^A.APP. 794/2006 # UOI Appellant ! Through : Mr. S.S. Gulia,
#IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Decision:December, 2006
+LA.APP. 793/2006
#U.O.IAppellant
!Through : Mr. S.S. Gulia, Advocate.
versus
$JITENDER KUMAR &ANRRespondentAThrough ; Mr, Sanjay Poddar, Advocate.
+,/^A.APP. 794/2006
AND
#UOIAppellant!Through : Mr. S.S. Gulia, Advocate.
versus
$MADAN MOHAN & ANR
Respondent
^
Through : Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Advocate
+LA.APP. 795/2006
AND
#U.O.IAppellant
!
Through : Mr. S.S. Gulia, Advocate.
versus
$TARA CHAND & ANRRespondent
^
Through ; Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Advocate
Page 1 of 2
Digitally Signed By:AMULYASigning Date:08.02.2024 16:40Certify that the digital file and physical filehave been compared and the digital data is asper the physical file and no page is missing.
+LA.APP. 797/2006
#UOI ..... Appellant
!Through : Mr. S.S. Gulia, Advocate.
versus
$RANDHIR SINGH& ORS.RespondentThrough : Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Advocate.
CORAM:
*HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKUL MUDGAL*HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.P. SINGH
1. Whether Reporters oflocal papers may be allowed to see thejudgment.2.To be referred to the Reporter or not?3.Whether the judgment should bereported inthe Digest?
* Mukul Mudgal J.
These are the appeals filed by the appellants challenging the order,judgment and decree passed by the learned Additional District Judge in respectof theland acquired in village Bakkarwala. Section 4 notification was issued on15.10.1993 for public purpose namely for "water treatment plant of DwarkaProject". The Land Acquisition Collector made the award bearing No. 12/95-96@Rs. 96,875/- perbigha. Upon reference under Section 18 of the Act the samewas enhanced to Rs.1,08,000/- per bigha by the learned Additional DistrictJudge. The assessment for the compensation has been challenged by both the land owners and the Land Acquisition Collector. It is admitted that this court inthe case of LA.APP. No.189/2006 titled Jai Singh & Ors. Vs. UOI decided on 25.5.2006 fixed the market value of the land acquired by the same award at Rs.1,32,000/- per bigha.
In view of the decision of Jai Singh (supra) the same are liable to be dismissed and as such dismissed leaving the parties to bear their own costs.
MtJ^ULMUDGAL,J
DECEMBER 07,2006mb
J-PiiSlNGH, J
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…