Gujarat High Court
SCA/17635/2003 of PATEL MAMTABEN RANCHHODBHAI Vs R K CHAUDHARY on 22 December 2003
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 17635 of 2003 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 17635 of 2003
For Approval and Signature:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals?
-------------------------------------------------------------- PATEL MAMTABEN RANCHHODBHAI
Versus R K CHAUDHARY
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 17635 of 2003 MR JV JAPEE for Petitioner No. 1 Ms NANDINI JOSHI, AGP for Respondent No. 1-3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
— Date of decision: 22/12/2003
ORAL JUDGEMENT
This order is passed in continuation of the order dated 18.12.2003.
2. Heard Mr JV Japee, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms Nandini Joshi, learned AGP for the respondents.
Rule. Ms Nandini Joshi, learned AGP waives service of Rule for the respondents.
3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, now that respondent No.2-Mamlatdar, Prantij has realized that he has power to issue certificate as per the Government Resolution dated 3.9.1994, the Mamlatdar, Prantij will consider and decide the petitioner's application for issuance of certificate about the petitioner's status as a widow by 24.12.2003. Till the Mamlatdar, Prantij considers and decides the petitioner's application for certificate and till the Mamlatdar issues such certificate and resp. Nos. 1 and 3 consider the petitioner's application, respondent Nos. 1 and 3 shall keep one seat in PTC Course reserved for widows vacant, in case the widows less meritorious than the petitioner are to be considered for admissions to PTC Course.
The petition stands disposed of in terms of the aforesaid directions. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.
Direct Service is permitted.
�����(M.S. Shah, J.)
sundar/-