Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/64779/2018 of POONAM AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 31 December 2018
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Sr. No.: 121 Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-64779 of 2018 (O & M) Date of Decision: December 31, 2018 Poonam & another ..... PETITIONERS VERSUS State of Punjab & others ..... RESPONDENTS . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL . .
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARHSr. No.: 121
Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-64779 of 2018 (O & M) Date of Decision: December 31, 2018
Poonam & another
..... PETITIONERS
VERSUS
State of Punjab & others
..... RESPONDENTS
. . .
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL . . .
PRESENT: - Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners.
. . .
Harnaresh Singh Gill, J (Oral)
This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for issuance of directions to the officials respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6.
Notice to official respondents only at this stage.
On the asking of Court, Mr. Pawan Sharda, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent - State. Copy of the petition be supplied to him during the course of the day.
The present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Hoshiarpur, to look into the grievances of the petitioners unfolded by them in their representation/application dated 27.12.2018 (Annexure P-6) and if found necessary, take appropriate measures in accordance with law.
Crl. Misc. No.M-64779 of 2018 [2]
However, this order shall not be construed as a measure to treat the marriage of the petitioners valid or legal.
(Harnaresh Singh Gill)
December 31, 2018 Judge
avin
Whether Speaking/ Reasoned: Whether Reportable:
Yes/ No Yes/ No