Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/2145/2020 of MOHAMMAD IQBAL DAR Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (FOOD AND SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT) on 31 December 2020
OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR (Through Video Conference) CM No. 6885/2020 in WP (C) No. 2145/2020 Mohammad Iqbal Dar ...Petitioner/Applicant(s) Through :- Mr. Shahbaz Sikander Mir, Advocate V/s < Union Territory of J&K and others .....Respondent (s) ' t Through :- Coram:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
(Through Video Conference)
CM No. 6885/2020 in
WP (C) No. 2145/2020
Mohammad Iqbal Dar
...Petitioner/Applicant(s)
Through :- Mr. Shahbaz Sikander Mir, Advocate V/s <
Union Territory of J&K and others .....Respondent (s)
't
Through :-
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
(through Video Conference from High Court Jammu)
ORDER31.12.2020
CM No. 6885/2020
The instant application has been filed by the petitioner seeking extension of time for filing the affidavit, stamp and court fee etc in support of the petition.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The petitioner shall do the needful within a period of three days, when the normal functioning of the Courts begins.
Application is, accordingly, disposed of.
WP (C) No. 2145/2020
The short grievance raised by the petitioner in this petition is that his application for allotment of fair price shop is under consideration before the respondents and till date no decision has been taken.
In view of communication dated 14.09.2019 marked as annexure-1, communication dated 19.02.2020 marked as annexure-4 and also the communication dated 26.02.2020, it is evident that the case of the petitioner for the allotment of the fair price shop is pending consideration before the respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner would feel satisfied, in case the representation of the petitioner is decided by the respondents within a prescribed time frame.
Having regard to the grievance of the petitioner and the relief sought, this petition can be disposed of at this stage and, as such, is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner and take an appropriate decision in accordance with prevalent rules in vogue, within a period of three months from the date copy of this order is received by the respondents.
Disposed of.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 31.12.2020 Rakesh
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No