Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CCP(S)/63/2023 of RAJEEV SHARMA Vs MR SHALEEN KABRA AND OTHRS on 2 September 2025
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CCP(S) No.63/2023 in WP(C) No.2896/2022 CM No.4332/2024 CM No.3273/2024 Rajeev Sharma …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. H.L. Koul, Advocate. q vs Seema Gupta & Anr. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Nazia Fazal, Advocate vice
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKHAT JAMMU
CCP(S) No.63/2023 in WP(C) No.2896/2022 CM No.4332/2024 CM No.3273/2024
Rajeev Sharma
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. H.L. Koul, Advocate.
q
vs
Seema Gupta & Anr.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Nazia Fazal, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr.AAG.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
02.09.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order, sought to be enforced by virtue of present contempt petition, stands implemented and the contempt is required to be closed. Statement is taken on record.
In view of the above, present petition is disposed of along with connected application(s).
(Rajesh Sekhri) Judge
Jammu02.09.2025Eva