Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CRM(M)/667/2023 of SARITA KOHLI AND ANOTHER Vs MALVIKA GUPTA on 26 August 2025
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CRM(M) No. 667/2023 Sarita Kohli and Anr. …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None. q vs Malvika Gupta .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Navyug Sethi, Advocate. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE ORDER 26.08.2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKHAT JAMMU
CrlM No. 1790/2025 in CRM(M) No. 667/2023
Serial No. 94
Sarita Kohli & Anr. …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Pranav Khajuria, Advocate vs
.…Respondent(s)
Malvika Gupta
Through: Mr. Navyug Sethi, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER(17.10.2025)
01. This application has been moved by the petitioners for the correction of a typographical error, in judgment dated 26.08.2025, passed by this Court in CRM(M) No. 667/2023. The aforesaid judgment came to be disposed of with the consent of learned counsel for the respondent that he had no objection to the petition and to quashment of the impugned order. However, a typographical error crept in the said judgment that impugned order is upheld.
02. In view of the above, the present application is allowed by providing that the impugned Order dated 27.07.2023, passed by learned Principal Sessions Judge, Jammu, in CRM(M) No. 667/2023 be read as “quashed”.
03. Disposed of.
(RAJESH SEKHRI)
JUDGE
Jammu 17.10.2025 Sapna