Jammu and Kashmir High Court

WP(C)/3277/2023 of MOHD AMIN Vs U T OF J AND K TH SECRETARY REVENUE DEPTT AND OTHERS on 30 December 2023

OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU. WP(C) No. 3277/2023 Mohd. Amin …. Petitioner(s) Through :- Mr. Bari Abdullah, Advocate. V/s UT of J&K and Ors. ….Respondent(s) Through :- Coram: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE ORDER 30.12.2023. 1. By this

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU.

WP(C) No. 3277/2023

Mohd. Amin

…. Petitioner(s)

Through :- Mr. Bari Abdullah, Advocate.

V/s

UT of J&K and Ors.

….Respondent(s)

Through :-

Coram: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE

ORDER

30.12.2023.

1. By this petition, the petitioner herein has challenged Order dated 16.12.2023, whereby the petitioner has been directed to deposit the default amount and clear the NOC from the bank and in case of failure, the salary of the petitioner shall be stopped for the month of December, 2023

Page 1 of 2

2. It is stated that the petitioner is working in the medical department since long and has availed many loans and is paying installments regularly without any fault. Respondent No. 4, on the basis of the letter issued by respondent No. 3 dated 19.10.2023 and circular issued by respondent No.2 dated 21.07.2022 has issued the order impugned which has been assailed on three counts, firstly- no opportunity of being heard has been given to the petitioner, secondly-without any fault/default by the petitioner, the default amount of some other borrower has been directed to be paid by the petitioner and in default it has been directed that salary of the petitioner should be stopped, thirdly- there is a old rivalry between the petitioner and father of respondent No. 5, due to which the guarantee papers, which have been signed by the petitioner for the loan case of his wife, have been annexed by the father of respondent No. 5 to secure the loan for his son.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he is not in possession of any other document except the impugned letter dated 16.12.2023. He further states that he would be satisfied if the instant writ petition is treated as representation and the respondents are directed to consider and take appropriate decision within some stipulated period.

4. Be that as it may, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the writ petition of the petitioner as representation within a period of two weeks from the date a copy of this order along with copy of writ petition with annexures are furnished to the respondents. Respondents are directed to pass speaking order within two weeks, thereafter, till then no recovery proceedings be invited by the respondents.

(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge

Jammu: 30.12.2023Neha-1

Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead