CIVIL APPEAL 19791 of 2012 on 25 October 1952

1. The State Of Bihar through Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna

2. The Maha Samadesta, Bihar Home Guard Mukhyalaya, Bihar, Patna

3. The Up-Maha Samadesta, Bihar Home Guard Mukhyalaya, Bihar, Patna

4. The Divisional Samadesta, Bihar Home Guard, Darbhanga Division,DarbhangaDarbhanga

5. The Samadesta, Bihar Home Guard Mukhyalaya, Bihar, Patna

6. The District Samadesta, Bihar Home Guard Madhubani 416-09-2025

... ... Respondent/s

======================================================Appearance :For the Petitioner/s: NoneFor the Respondent/s: Ms. Shail Kumari, Advocate======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHYORAL ORDER

No one appears for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondents is present.

2. The petitioner has filed the instant application forthe following relief(s):

“i) For a direction to respondents authorityto retire the petitioner as per the date of birth02.01.1960 (Second January Nineteen Sixty)mentioned in the Service-Book as per the date of birthof school certificate disposing the pendingrepresentation.(ii) For a direction to the respondentsauthority to quash the order dated 13.11.1997whereby and whereunder the date of birth of the Saurabh/- U

petitioner mentioned in the Service-Book has beenchanged as 25.10.1952 (Twenty five October NineteenFifty Two) passed by The Samadesta, Bihar HomeGuard Mukhyalaya, Bihar, Patna and same was notcommunicated to the petitioner as per the informationcommunicated by the Samadesta, Bihar Home GuardSamastipur.

(iii) For a direction to any otherrelief/reliefs for which petitioner be found entitled to”

3. No one appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 25.8.2025 when this Court recorded the following order:

“No one appears on behalf of thepetitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent-State ispresent.

2. This is an old mater of the year 2013

(sic) and still the petitioner is not showing interest inappearing and pressing the writ application.

3. One last indulgence is being granted tothe petitioner, flailing (sic) which on the next date, theCourt may consider dismissing the writ application onmerits.

4. Put up this case on 15.09.2025.”

4. As no one appears on behalf of the petitioner today also, the case is dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Partha Sarthy, J)