Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/2249/2025 of BUILDING OPERATION CONTROLLING AUTHORITY TH COMMISSIONER JAMMU AND OTHERS Vs SEEMA GUPTA AND ANOTHER on 2 September 2025
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 2249/2025 Building Operation Controlling Authority and Ors. …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Mayank Gupta, Advocate. q vs Seema Gupta and Anr. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocate with Ms. Arsha
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKHAT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2249/2025
Building Operation Controlling …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Authority and Ors.
Through: Mr. Mayank Gupta, Advocate.
q
vs
Seema Gupta and Anr. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocate with Ms. Arsha Sharma, Advocate.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER02.09.2025
Vide order dated 21.05.2025, petitioners came to be directed by J&K Special Tribunal, Jammu [“the Tribunal”], to consider the regularisation of violation, if any, in accordance with the enabling provisions of the J&K Unified Building Bye-Laws, 2021 within a period of one month, after undertaking fresh measurements and taking into consideration the factum of building permission dated 07.12.2011 issued for the portion of land measuring 1826 sq. ft., as also the existence of dilapidatedtriple story building existing on the aforesaid land as per sale deed dated 07.09.2016.
Mr. Mayank Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners has informed this Court that petitioners have not considered the matter pursuant to the aforesaid order and seeks some time to do the needful.
Having regard to the limited nature of controversy, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to consider the matter, in the light of the impugned order dated 21.05.2025, passed by the Tribunal within a period of six weeks from the date copy of this order is made available. Till then, impugned order shall stay.
(Rajesh Sekhri)
Judge