Gujarat High Court
AO/486/1992 of HEIRS OF HARILAL RAMJI Vs HARILAL RAMJI,A REGD FIRM on 17 December 1998
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No 486 of 1992 with APPEAL FROM ORDER No 487 of 1992 with CIVIL APPLICATION No 4386 of 1992 with CIVIL APPLICATION No 4387 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
APPEAL FROM ORDER No 486 of 1992
with
APPEAL FROM ORDER No 487 of 1992
with
CIVIL APPLICATION No 4386 of 1992
with
CIVIL APPLICATION No 4387 of 1992
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- HEIRS OF HARILAL RAMJIVersus HARILAL RAMJI,A REGD FIRM -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR JR NANAVATI for Appellants MR SURESH M SHAH for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT Date of decision: 17/12/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT parties.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the respective
2. As a result of the hearing and discussion, a consensus has been arrived at between the learned counsel on the basis of which, it is directed as under.
(A) The trial court shall hear and dispose off the pending suits namely Special Civil Suit No. 4 of 1992 and Special Civil Suit No. 2 of 1992 as expeditiously as possible and in any case not later than 30th April, 1999.
(B) It is clarified and directed that until the said suits are disposed off, the interim orders passed in the present appeals shall continue to operate.
3. In view of the aforesaid directions, learned counsel for the appellant does not press these appeals for any further reliefs and the same are accordingly disposed off.
4. Consequently, the above Civil Applications also do not survive and are accordingly disposed off subject to the observations and directions made hereinabove.
5. The Registry is directed to send yadi to the trial court forthwith i.e. not later than 23rd December, 1998. Direct service is also permitted.
trial court forthwith i.e. not later than 23rd December, ********
pirzada/-