Gujarat High Court

SCA/1839/1994 of HITESHBHAI PRAGJIBHAI GOHEL Vs DIST.DEVELOPMENT OFFICER on 23 October 1997

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1839 of 1994 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1839 of 1994

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE

============================================================

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?

4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?

-------------------------------------------------------------- HITESHBHAI PRAGJIBHAI GOHELVersus DIST.DEVELOPMENT OFFICER -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR PH PATHAK for Petitioners Mr. B.F. Mehta for Mr. C.S. Upadhyaya for Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 23/10/97

ORAL JUDGEMENT Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the considered opinion that the interest of justice will be served in case this special civil application is disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners with reference to resolution at Annexure R at page 23 filed along with the reply affidavit within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case the petitioners are eligible for grant of benefits under the aforesaid resolution then those benefits should be given to them within a reasonable period of two months. However, in case the petitioners are not found entitled to the benefits of the aforesaid resolution then a reasoned order may be passed and copy thereof be sent by Registered Post Acknowledgment due to the petitioners. Liberty to the petitioners to revive the petition in case of difficulty. The special civil application and the rule therein stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead