Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Crl R/56/2023 of UT OF JK THROUGH SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER Vs SHANKER SINGH on 17 September 2025
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Crl R No.56/2023 UT of J&K …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Pawan Dev Singh, Dy.AG. q vs Shanker Singh .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Anil Gupta, Advocate. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE ORDER
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKHAT JAMMU
Crl R No.56/2023
UT of J&K …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Pawan Dev Singh, Dy.AG. vs
q
Shanker Singh .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Anil Gupta, Advocate.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
17.09.2025
01. Vide impugned order dated 17.06.2023, passed by learned Special Judge, Fast Track Court (POCSO Cases), Jammu, [“the trial Court”], respondent was admitted to interim bail in case titled ‘Shanker Singh through his Mother Samriti Devi V. UT of J&K through SHO P/S Bagh-e-Bahu, Jammu’ for offences under Sections 366-A, 342, 344 IPC; 4/6/16 of POCSO Act and 5/6/7/18 of Immoral Trafficking Prevention Act.
02. The petitioner-UT is aggrieved of the impugned order, primarily, on the ground of gravity of the charge. The petitioner-UT, instead of approaching the trial Court for cancellation of bail has straightway invoked revisional jurisdiction of this Court for cancellation of bail against the interim order which is not maintainable. Hence, the present petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the trial Court and avail the appropriate remedy under law. 03.Disposed of.
(Rajesh Sekhri)
Judge