Gujarat High Court
SCA/1257/1987 of B N PANDYA Vs GUJARAT STATE FINANCIAL CORPN on 10 December 2003
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1257 of 1987 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1257 of 1987
For Approval and Signature:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- B N PANDYA
Versus
GUJARAT STATE FINANCIAL CORPN -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 1257 of 1987 MR AMIT M PANCHAL for Petitioner No. 1-6 MR KM PATEL for Respondent No. 1 MR SUNDAR RKV for Respondent No. 2-8 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR
Date of decision: 10/12/2003
ORAL JUDGEMENT
It has been pointed out to this Court that after filing this petition, some of the petitioners have already taken the benefit of V.R.S. and some have been given the benefit of promotion by the department.
Considering the subsequent development, which has occurred during the pendency of this petition, the petitioners are not pressing this petition as this petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Liberty to apply in case of difficulty.
�����(P.B.Majmudar,J.)
/malek