Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/64814/2018 of RICHA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 31 December 2018
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-64814-2018 Date of decision: 31.12.2018 Richa and another ….Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN Present: Mr. Rajender Kumar, Advocate for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CRM-M-648 14-201
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
CRM-M-648 14-201Date of decision: 31.12.2018
Richa and another
... Petitione
Versus
State of Haryana and others
... Responden
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present:Mr. Rajender Kumar, Advocatefor the petitioners, KOK OK
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN,J.|(Oral)
The petitioners have approached this Court seeking protectionof their life and liberty on the premise that petitioner No.1 has pertormedmarriage with petitioner No.2 against the wishes of her parents and otherfamily members and the petitioners are apprehending threat to their life andliberty at their instance.
Notice of motion.
On asking of the Court, Ms. Tanisha Peshwaria, DAG, Haryanaaccepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that arepresentation dated 28.12.2018 was made to the Superintendent of Police,Kurukshetra (Annexure P-4) seeking necessary protection but no action hasbeen taken so far in the matter.
CRM-M-648 14-201
Heard.
Without examining the question of validity or otherwise ofmarriage of the petitioners, the present petition stands disposed of with adirection to the Superintendent of Police, Kurukshetra to look intogrievance of the petitioners expressed in the representation (Annexure P-4)and take appropriate action, if any, warranted in the circumstances.
The Superintendent of Police, Kurukshetra is further directed toalrange a meeting of respondent No.4 with petitioner No.1 in case any suchapplication is moved, It is made clear that in case any FIR is registered againstpetitioner No.2, it will be open for the police authorities to take action, inaccordance with law.
|}ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN |31.12 27018JUDGE
vishnu
Whether speaking/reasonedYes/NoWhether reportableYes/No