Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WRIT PETITION 2702/2018 on 31 December 2018
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIRAT JAMMU
OWP No.2702/2018
IA No.1/2018
Date of order: 31.12.2018
M/s Copier Corporation Plus Ltd & ors Vs State of J&K & ors.
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Gupta, Judge Appearing counsel:
For petitioner/appellant (s) : Mr. Parag Sharma, Advocate For respondent(s) : Mr. Ayjaz Lone, GA
i/ Whether to be reported in : Yes/No Press/Media Press/Media ii/ Whether to be reported in : Yes/No Digest/Journal Digest/Journal
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 103 of the Constitution of J&K State, the petitioners inter alia seek the following reliefs:
i)Certiorari quashing Annexure-A issued by official respondents on 04.12.2018 specifying the rates submitted by respondent No.4 being L1.
ii) Writ of Certiorari quashing the tender notice No.DSS/RC/78
of 2018 dated 04.09.2018 which does not authorize the official respondents to adopt the criteria of L-1 method.
iii) Writ of Prohibition restraining the official respondent Nos.1 to 3 to act upon the Tender Notice No.DSS/RC/78 of 2018 dated 3 to act upon the Tender Notice No.DSS/RC/78 of 2018 dated 04.09.2018.
2. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioners submits at the Bar that he would feel satisfied in case the petition in hand is disposed of with a direction to the official respondents to treat this writ petition as representation and consider the same within a certain time frame. His statement is taken on record.
3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition is, disposed of, with a direction to the respondent No.2 to consider the claim of the petitioners by treating this writ petition as representation and take a decision thereon, strictly under rules, on the basis of averments made in the petition and pass consideration order within a period of two weeks from the date a certified copy of the order passed today along with complete set of writ petition is made available to respondent No.2.
4. Disposed of as above along with connected MP.
Jammu: 31.12.2018 Vijay
(Sanjay Kumar Gupta)
Judge