Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/12310/2022 of SHAGANPREET AND ANR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 30 December 2022
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-12310-2022 Date of decision : 30.12.2022 Shaganpreet and another .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ *** Present :- Mr. Mukul Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners. ***
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
117IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA.AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-12310-2022Date of decision : 30.12.2022
Shaganpreet and another
.Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
wee REeSpondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICERAJESH BHARDWAJ222222
Present :-Mr. Mukul Goyal, Advocatefor the petitioners.for the petitioners.
222
RAJESH BHARDWAJ_J. (Oral)
Present petition has been filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India for directing respondents no.1 to 3 to protect the lifeand liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents no.4 to 6.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both thepetitioners are major and have married against the wishes of respondentsno.4 to 6 and have sought protection to their life and liberty. Theyapprehend danger from respondents no.4 to 6. Their marriage certificateand photographs evidencing their marriage are on record as AnnexuresP-3 and P-4 respectively. The petitioners have submitted a representationdated 26.12.2022 (Annexure P-5) to respondent no.2.
Notice of motion to respondents no.1 to 3-State only.
On the asking of the Court, Mr. Vishnav Gandhi, DAG,Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the State.
Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiaryvalue of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with adirection to respondent no.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Bathinda to CRWP-12310-2022
decide the representation (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners and grantthem protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It isclarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to thepetitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed bythem. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinionwhatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners.Disposed of 30.12.2022m. sharma ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ )JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned|Yes/NoWhether reportableYes/No